← the index
Anil-matcha/Open-Generative-AI ↗
20.4%
of 373 commits were committed by an AI agent — a floor, not an estimate
20.4% agent · top contributor 93.4%4 contributors
individual

One person is driving this. The headline number reflects a single contributor's workflow, not a project-wide shift.

76
agent commits
297
human commits
4
agent contributors
93.4%
largest contributor

Assisted or autonomous

76assisted
0autonomous

Assisted — a developer’s identity authored the commit and the agent added itself as co-author. The agent ran git commit during a working session, with a person there. Autonomous — a bot identity is the author, no human in the loop. Across the whole index, 93.7% of agent commits are assisted.

Agent share by month

Feb26
Mar26
Apr26
May26
Jun26
Jul26
Aug26
Sep26

Peak month: 52.6%. Bars are scaled to that peak, not to 100%.

Which agents

Claude CodeAnthropic7620.4%

Verify it yourself

Sample commits that matched. Every one links to GitHub — check the trailers.

  • 36e42d7adocs: update featured video titleClaude Code
  • 38127c6ddocs: swap featured video to 50 AI apps walkthroughClaude Code
  • 92e82c24docs: feature the Vox-style motion graphics video (replace fal-alternativeClaude Code

What was excluded

Commits in window452
Merge commits removed−79
CI / dependency bots removed−0
Considered373

Bots are excluded from the denominator entirely. Counting dependabot as “AI-written code” is the fastest way to produce a meaningless number.

How this was measured

Measured over February–August 2026, cloned directly. Detection is deterministic string matching against signatures agents write about themselves — no heuristics, no style analysis. Merge commits and CI bots are excluded from the denominator. The figure is a floor: squash merges strip trailers, so real usage is higher. Contributor counts are aggregate — no individual is named.

Run it yourself: npx qmmit-cli Anil-matcha/Open-Generative-AI

Scan another repository

Try