← the index
BurntSushi/ripgrep
0%
of 81 commits were committed by an AI agent — a floor, not an estimate
Too little recent activity to publish. Only 81 commits landed in this window, so the percentage is noisy. Repositories below 100 are excluded from the index for this reason.

This repository is human-committed

No agent signatures were found in the last 81 commits. That is a real result, not a failure to measure.

It does not mean no AI was used here. This counts commits authored by an agent — where the agent itself ran the commit and signed it. A developer who writes code with Claude Code or Cursor and then commits it by hand leaves nothing in git to detect, and correctly shows 0%.

0
agent commits
81
human commits
agent contributors
largest contributor

What was excluded

Commits in window81
Merge commits removed0
CI / dependency bots removed0
Considered81

Bots are excluded from the denominator entirely. Counting dependabot as “AI-written code” is the fastest way to produce a meaningless number.

How this was measured

Measured over February–August 2026, cloned directly. Detection is deterministic string matching against signatures agents write about themselves — no heuristics, no style analysis. Merge commits and CI bots are excluded from the denominator. The figure is a floor: squash merges strip trailers, so real usage is higher. Contributor counts are aggregate — no individual is named.

Run it yourself: npx qmmit-cli BurntSushi/ripgrep

Scan another repository