Adoption is broad. Many contributors are committing agent-authored work, which is what a real organisational rollout looks like.
Assisted or autonomous
Assisted — a developer’s identity authored the commit and the agent added itself as co-author. The agent ran git commit during a working session, with a person there. Autonomous — a bot identity is the author, no human in the loop. Across the whole index, 93.7% of agent commits are assisted.
Agent share by month
Peak month: 9.5%. Bars are scaled to that peak, not to 100%.
Which agents
| Claude Code | Anthropic | 70 | 2.9% |
| GitHub Copilot | GitHub | 59 | 2.5% |
Verify it yourself
Sample commits that matched. Every one links to GitHub — check the trailers.
5983b257Skip duplicate /v2/ when artifact domain already contains itClaude Codef453ee9btest/os/mac/keg: require `macho`Claude Codea18dc373tap: require `trust` in `Tap#to_hash`Claude Coded5f86b08Allow keg to receive combined oldname_opt_recordsGitHub Copilot80bf383adev-cmd/extract: use cleanpath to normalize patch pathGitHub Copilot9fe057afcask/installer: improve require handling.GitHub Copilot
What was excluded
| Commits in window | 4,280 |
| Merge commits removed | −1,760 |
| CI / dependency bots removed | −115 |
| Considered | 2,405 |
Bots are excluded from the denominator entirely. Counting dependabot as “AI-written code” is the fastest way to produce a meaningless number.
How this was measured
Measured over February–August 2026, cloned directly. Detection is deterministic string matching against signatures agents write about themselves — no heuristics, no style analysis. Merge commits and CI bots are excluded from the denominator. The figure is a floor: squash merges strip trailers, so real usage is higher. Contributor counts are aggregate — no individual is named.
Run it yourself: npx qmmit-cli Homebrew/brew