← the index
JimLiu/baoyu-skills
7.3%
of 551 commits were committed by an AI agent — a floor, not an estimate
7.3% agent · top contributor 42.5%17 contributors
org-wide

Adoption is broad. Many contributors are committing agent-authored work, which is what a real organisational rollout looks like.

40
agent commits
511
human commits
17
agent contributors
42.5%
largest contributor

Assisted or autonomous

40assisted
0autonomous

Assisted — a developer’s identity authored the commit and the agent added itself as co-author. The agent ran git commit during a working session, with a person there. Autonomous — a bot identity is the author, no human in the loop. Across the whole index, 93.7% of agent commits are assisted.

Agent share by month

Feb26
Mar26
Apr26
May26
Jun26
Jul26
Sep26

Peak month: 50%. Bars are scaled to that peak, not to 100%.

Which agents

Claude CodeAnthropic407.3%

Verify it yourself

Sample commits that matched. Every one links to GitHub — check the trailers.

  • 52f3d500fix(baoyu-fetch): bump jsdom to ^30 so pages with browser-serialized CSS pClaude Code
  • 40e37fabfix(baoyu-fetch): 构建时将 jsdom 设为 external,修复发布产物在他人机器上崩溃 (#207)Claude Code
  • c9a50cc9fix(baoyu-post-to-x): 修复紧贴中文的加粗/斜体在 X Articles 渲染为字面 ** 的问题 (#189)Claude Code

What was excluded

Commits in window588
Merge commits removed37
CI / dependency bots removed0
Considered551

Bots are excluded from the denominator entirely. Counting dependabot as “AI-written code” is the fastest way to produce a meaningless number.

How this was measured

Measured over February–August 2026, cloned directly. Detection is deterministic string matching against signatures agents write about themselves — no heuristics, no style analysis. Merge commits and CI bots are excluded from the denominator. The figure is a floor: squash merges strip trailers, so real usage is higher. Contributor counts are aggregate — no individual is named.

Run it yourself: npx qmmit-cli JimLiu/baoyu-skills

Scan another repository