← the index
MisterBooo/LeetCodeAnimation ↗
57.1%
of 7 commits were committed by an AI agent — a floor, not an estimate
Too little recent activity to publish. Only 7 commits landed in this window, so the percentage is noisy. Repositories below 100 are excluded from the index for this reason.
57.1% agent · top contributor 100%1 contributor
individual

One person is driving this. The headline number reflects a single contributor's workflow, not a project-wide shift.

4
agent commits
3
human commits
1
agent contributors
100%
largest contributor

Assisted or autonomous

4assisted
0autonomous

Assisted — a developer’s identity authored the commit and the agent added itself as co-author. The agent ran git commit during a working session, with a person there. Autonomous — a bot identity is the author, no human in the loop. Across the whole index, 93.7% of agent commits are assisted.

Which agents

Claude CodeAnthropic457.1%

Verify it yourself

Sample commits that matched. Every one links to GitHub — check the trailers.

  • e853d7a5[readme-conversion] Star 区标题去内部黑话(299役收官→陪它持续更新, 中英)Claude Code
  • dc713cda[readme-conversion] English README 升级二期版式 + index-by-topic 漂移校正Claude Code
  • 0b36a61b[readme-conversion] 发布 README 二期转化层 + 数字段脚本接管Claude Code

What was excluded

Commits in window7
Merge commits removed−0
CI / dependency bots removed−0
Considered7

Bots are excluded from the denominator entirely. Counting dependabot as “AI-written code” is the fastest way to produce a meaningless number.

How this was measured

Measured over February–August 2026, cloned directly. Detection is deterministic string matching against signatures agents write about themselves — no heuristics, no style analysis. Merge commits and CI bots are excluded from the denominator. The figure is a floor: squash merges strip trailers, so real usage is higher. Contributor counts are aggregate — no individual is named.

Run it yourself: npx qmmit-cli MisterBooo/LeetCodeAnimation

Scan another repository

Try