← the index
aishwaryanr/awesome-generative-ai-guide ↗
17%
of 100 commits were committed by an AI agent — a floor, not an estimate
17% agent · top contributor 100%1 contributor
individual

One person is driving this. The headline number reflects a single contributor's workflow, not a project-wide shift.

17
agent commits
83
human commits
1
agent contributors
100%
largest contributor

Assisted or autonomous

17assisted
0autonomous

Assisted — a developer’s identity authored the commit and the agent added itself as co-author. The agent ran git commit during a working session, with a person there. Autonomous — a bot identity is the author, no human in the loop. Across the whole index, 93.7% of agent commits are assisted.

Agent share by month

Feb26
Mar26
Apr26
May26
Jun26
Jul26
Aug26
Sep26

Peak month: 66.7%. Bars are scaled to that peak, not to 100%.

Which agents

Claude CodeAnthropic1717%

Verify it yourself

Sample commits that matched. Every one links to GitHub — check the trailers.

  • c2f748d0Add OpenClaw Mastery for Everyone free courseClaude Code
  • a4d67dbaFix Colab directory navigation for correct data pathsClaude Code
  • 81df22e8Remove 'Next: Chapter X' from chapter break markersClaude Code

What was excluded

Commits in window111
Merge commits removed−11
CI / dependency bots removed−0
Considered100

Bots are excluded from the denominator entirely. Counting dependabot as “AI-written code” is the fastest way to produce a meaningless number.

How this was measured

Measured over February–August 2026, cloned directly. Detection is deterministic string matching against signatures agents write about themselves — no heuristics, no style analysis. Merge commits and CI bots are excluded from the denominator. The figure is a floor: squash merges strip trailers, so real usage is higher. Contributor counts are aggregate — no individual is named.

Run it yourself: npx qmmit-cli aishwaryanr/awesome-generative-ai-guide

Scan another repository

Try