Adoption is broad. Many contributors are committing agent-authored work, which is what a real organisational rollout looks like.
Assisted or autonomous
Assisted — a developer’s identity authored the commit and the agent added itself as co-author. The agent ran git commit during a working session, with a person there. Autonomous — a bot identity is the author, no human in the loop. Across the whole index, 93.7% of agent commits are assisted.
Agent share by month
Peak month: 14.8%. Bars are scaled to that peak, not to 100%.
Which agents
| Claude Code | Anthropic | 9 | 3.4% |
| GitHub Copilot | GitHub | 5 | 1.9% |
Verify it yourself
Sample commits that matched. Every one links to GitHub — check the trailers.
3b89409crefactor: extract _docker_exec helper in TerminalToolkit to reduce Docker Claude Code874c0183feat(interpreters): add @dependencies_required decorators to interpreter cClaude Code1db1ed17Upgrade Firecrawl loader to firecrawl-py v2 (v4 SDK) + add search() (#4095Claude Codeb284ffd0feat(workforce): add stream chunk events to workforce callback system (#40GitHub Copilot7efbcbbdAdd augmented assignment operator support to InternalPythonInterpreter (#3GitHub Copilotad64aef1Remove embodied_agent and deductive_reasoner_agent modules (#3799)GitHub Copilot
What was excluded
| Commits in window | 264 |
| Merge commits removed | −0 |
| CI / dependency bots removed | −0 |
| Considered | 264 |
Bots are excluded from the denominator entirely. Counting dependabot as “AI-written code” is the fastest way to produce a meaningless number.
How this was measured
Measured over February–August 2026, cloned directly. Detection is deterministic string matching against signatures agents write about themselves — no heuristics, no style analysis. Merge commits and CI bots are excluded from the denominator. The figure is a floor: squash merges strip trailers, so real usage is higher. Contributor counts are aggregate — no individual is named.
Run it yourself: npx qmmit-cli camel-ai/camel