← the index
clap-rs/clap
1.5%
of 137 commits were committed by an AI agent — a floor, not an estimate
1.5% agent · top contributor 100%1 contributor
individual

One person is driving this. The headline number reflects a single contributor's workflow, not a project-wide shift.

2
agent commits
135
human commits
1
agent contributors
100%
largest contributor

Assisted or autonomous

2assisted
0autonomous

Assisted — a developer’s identity authored the commit and the agent added itself as co-author. The agent ran git commit during a working session, with a person there. Autonomous — a bot identity is the author, no human in the loop. Across the whole index, 93.7% of agent commits are assisted.

Agent share by month

Feb26
Mar26
Apr26
May26
Jun26
Jul26
Aug26

Peak month: 8%. Bars are scaled to that peak, not to 100%.

Which agents

Cursor AgentAnysphere21.5%

Verify it yourself

Sample commits that matched. Every one links to GitHub — check the trailers.

  • 07c6fd2dfix(mangen): Hide hidden positionals from the SYNOPSISCursor Agent
  • 2003b342test(mangen): Show hidden positionals in the SYNOPSISCursor Agent

What was excluded

Commits in window207
Merge commits removed53
CI / dependency bots removed17
Considered137

Bots are excluded from the denominator entirely. Counting dependabot as “AI-written code” is the fastest way to produce a meaningless number.

How this was measured

Measured over February–August 2026, cloned directly. Detection is deterministic string matching against signatures agents write about themselves — no heuristics, no style analysis. Merge commits and CI bots are excluded from the denominator. The figure is a floor: squash merges strip trailers, so real usage is higher. Contributor counts are aggregate — no individual is named.

Run it yourself: npx qmmit-cli clap-rs/clap

Scan another repository