3.3%

of 2,146 commits were committed by an AI agent — a floor, not an estimate

3.3% agent · top contributor 25.4%19 contributors

org-wide

Adoption is broad. Many contributors are committing agent-authored work, which is what a real organisational rollout looks like.

agent commits

2,075

human commits

agent contributors

25.4%

largest contributor

Assisted or autonomous

71assisted

0autonomous

Assisted — a developer’s identity authored the commit and the agent added itself as co-author. The agent ran git commit during a working session, with a person there. Autonomous — a bot identity is the author, no human in the loop. Across the whole index, 93.7% of agent commits are assisted.

Agent share by month

Jan26

Feb26

Mar26

Apr26

May26

Jun26

Jul26

Aug26

Sep26

Peak month: 8.5%. Bars are scaled to that peak, not to 100%.

Which agents

Claude Code

Anthropic

3.3%

Verify it yourself

Sample commits that matched. Every one links to GitHub — check the trailers.

ef7edc4agtk/build: speed up repeated builds by letting the Zig build cache workClaude Code
607d59b0i18n: fix Lithuanian grammar and terminology consistency in lt.poClaude Code
ff5b87e4i18n: re-apply remaining lt.po review suggestionsClaude Code

What was excluded

Commits in window	3,619
Merge commits removed	−1,095
CI / dependency bots removed	−378
Considered	2,146

Bots are excluded from the denominator entirely. Counting dependabot as “AI-written code” is the fastest way to produce a meaningless number.

How this was measured

Measured over February–August 2026, cloned directly. Detection is deterministic string matching against signatures agents write about themselves — no heuristics, no style analysis. Merge commits and CI bots are excluded from the denominator. The figure is a floor: squash merges strip trailers, so real usage is higher. Contributor counts are aggregate — no individual is named.

Run it yourself: npx qmmit-cli ghostty-org/ghostty

Scan another repository

Try