← the index
iced-rs/iced ↗
0.9%
of 339 commits were committed by an AI agent — a floor, not an estimate
0.9% agent · top contributor 66.7%2 contributors
individual

One person is driving this. The headline number reflects a single contributor's workflow, not a project-wide shift.

3
agent commits
336
human commits
2
agent contributors
66.7%
largest contributor

Assisted or autonomous

3assisted
0autonomous

Assisted — a developer’s identity authored the commit and the agent added itself as co-author. The agent ran git commit during a working session, with a person there. Autonomous — a bot identity is the author, no human in the loop. Across the whole index, 93.7% of agent commits are assisted.

Agent share by month

Feb26
Mar26
Apr26
May26
Jun26
Jul26
Aug26
Sep26

Peak month: 5.3%. Bars are scaled to that peak, not to 100%.

Which agents

Cursor AgentAnysphere20.6%
Claude CodeAnthropic10.3%

Verify it yourself

Sample commits that matched. Every one links to GitHub — check the trailers.

  • fe4934caHonor ICED_TEST_BACKEND in Emulator like Simulator doesCursor Agent
  • 70f55887Load fonts in Emulator matching Simulator behaviorCursor Agent
  • c2e7ddfeHandle touch events in text editorClaude Code

What was excluded

Commits in window407
Merge commits removed−68
CI / dependency bots removed−0
Considered339

Bots are excluded from the denominator entirely. Counting dependabot as “AI-written code” is the fastest way to produce a meaningless number.

How this was measured

Measured over February–August 2026, cloned directly. Detection is deterministic string matching against signatures agents write about themselves — no heuristics, no style analysis. Merge commits and CI bots are excluded from the denominator. The figure is a floor: squash merges strip trailers, so real usage is higher. Contributor counts are aggregate — no individual is named.

Run it yourself: npx qmmit-cli iced-rs/iced

Scan another repository

Try