← the index
microsoft/winget-cli
15.1%
of 126 commits were committed by an AI agent — a floor, not an estimate
15.1% agent · top contributor 47.4%6 contributors
team

A small group is using agents. Adoption has spread beyond one person but is not project-wide.

19
agent commits
107
human commits
6
agent contributors
47.4%
largest contributor

Assisted or autonomous

19assisted
0autonomous

Assisted — a developer’s identity authored the commit and the agent added itself as co-author. The agent ran git commit during a working session, with a person there. Autonomous — a bot identity is the author, no human in the loop. Across the whole index, 93.7% of agent commits are assisted.

Agent share by month

Feb26
Mar26
Apr26
May26
Jun26
Jul26
Aug26
Sep26

Peak month: 44.4%. Bars are scaled to that peak, not to 100%.

Which agents

GitHub CopilotGitHub1915.1%

Verify it yourself

Sample commits that matched. Every one links to GitHub — check the trailers.

  • 1d41e671Add agent guidance for issues and PRs (#6446)GitHub Copilot
  • c7e7e619Add Copilot-Instructions label policy rule (#6440)GitHub Copilot
  • cba7c0dfImprove duplicate-surfacing search recall (in:title + high-recall queries)GitHub Copilot

What was excluded

Commits in window144
Merge commits removed0
CI / dependency bots removed18
Considered126

Bots are excluded from the denominator entirely. Counting dependabot as “AI-written code” is the fastest way to produce a meaningless number.

How this was measured

Measured over February–August 2026, cloned directly. Detection is deterministic string matching against signatures agents write about themselves — no heuristics, no style analysis. Merge commits and CI bots are excluded from the denominator. The figure is a floor: squash merges strip trailers, so real usage is higher. Contributor counts are aggregate — no individual is named.

Run it yourself: npx qmmit-cli microsoft/winget-cli

Scan another repository