Adoption is broad. Many contributors are committing agent-authored work, which is what a real organisational rollout looks like.
Assisted or autonomous
Assisted — a developer’s identity authored the commit and the agent added itself as co-author. The agent ran git commit during a working session, with a person there. Autonomous — a bot identity is the author, no human in the loop. Across the whole index, 93.7% of agent commits are assisted.
Agent share by month
Peak month: 38.1%. Bars are scaled to that peak, not to 100%.
Which agents
| Claude Code | Anthropic | 30 | 21.1% |
| Cursor Agent | Anysphere | 1 | 0.7% |
Verify it yourself
Sample commits that matched. Every one links to GitHub — check the trailers.
15de38fbfix(design): make workflows self-contained, add bundled-skill contract (#4Claude Code975cba32fix(brand): apply #497 to the source copy so check:assets passes againClaude Coded8ce090ffix(brand): stop adjustBrightness collapsing dark color shades to black (#Claude Code3da52ff1security: harden skill against agent-audit risk patterns (#417)Cursor Agent
What was excluded
| Commits in window | 176 |
| Merge commits removed | −34 |
| CI / dependency bots removed | −0 |
| Considered | 142 |
Bots are excluded from the denominator entirely. Counting dependabot as “AI-written code” is the fastest way to produce a meaningless number.
How this was measured
Measured over February–August 2026, cloned directly. Detection is deterministic string matching against signatures agents write about themselves — no heuristics, no style analysis. Merge commits and CI bots are excluded from the denominator. The figure is a floor: squash merges strip trailers, so real usage is higher. Contributor counts are aggregate — no individual is named.
Run it yourself: npx qmmit-cli nextlevelbuilder/ui-ux-pro-max-skill