1.4%

of 4,232 commits were committed by an AI agent — a floor, not an estimate

1.4% agent · top contributor 60.3%7 contributors

team

A small group is using agents. Adoption has spread beyond one person but is not project-wide.

agent commits

4,174

human commits

agent contributors

60.3%

largest contributor

Assisted or autonomous

22assisted

36autonomous

Assisted — a developer’s identity authored the commit and the agent added itself as co-author. The agent ran git commit during a working session, with a person there. Autonomous — a bot identity is the author, no human in the loop. Across the whole index, 93.7% of agent commits are assisted.

Agent share by month

Feb26

Mar26

Apr26

May26

Jun26

Jul26

Aug26

Sep26

Peak month: 7.3%. Bars are scaled to that peak, not to 100%.

Which agents

Claude Code

Anthropic

1.4%

Verify it yourself

Sample commits that matched. Every one links to GitHub — check the trailers.

cc00d1a4ci: drop package.json/pnpm-lock.yaml from unit test path filtersClaude Code
2d051424ci: bump unit test Node to 24.14.0 for Nuxt 4, widen path filtersClaude Code
4e6976cafix: sync pnpm-lock.yaml with Nuxt 4 manifest changesClaude Code

What was excluded

Commits in window	5,150
Merge commits removed	−828
CI / dependency bots removed	−90
Considered	4,232

Bots are excluded from the denominator entirely. Counting dependabot as “AI-written code” is the fastest way to produce a meaningless number.

How this was measured

Measured over February–August 2026, cloned directly. Detection is deterministic string matching against signatures agents write about themselves — no heuristics, no style analysis. Merge commits and CI bots are excluded from the denominator. The figure is a floor: squash merges strip trailers, so real usage is higher. Contributor counts are aggregate — no individual is named.

Run it yourself: npx qmmit-cli nocodb/nocodb

Scan another repository

Try