23.5%

of 3,720 commits were committed by an AI agent — a floor, not an estimate

23.5% agent · top contributor 43.8%27 contributors

org-wide

Adoption is broad. Many contributors are committing agent-authored work, which is what a real organisational rollout looks like.

875

agent commits

2,845

human commits

agent contributors

43.8%

largest contributor

Assisted or autonomous

851assisted

24autonomous

Assisted — a developer’s identity authored the commit and the agent added itself as co-author. The agent ran git commit during a working session, with a person there. Autonomous — a bot identity is the author, no human in the loop. Across the whole index, 93.7% of agent commits are assisted.

Agent share by month

Jan26

Feb26

Mar26

Apr26

May26

Jun26

Jul26

Aug26

Sep26

Peak month: 43.8%. Bars are scaled to that peak, not to 100%.

Which agents

Claude Code	Anthropic	847	22.8%
Cursor Agent	Anysphere	29	0.8%
Devin	Cognition	1	0%

Verify it yourself

Sample commits that matched. Every one links to GitHub — check the trailers.

4190ba91feat(ods): add `ods release cli` and `ods release ods` (#14724)Claude Code
16247eecbuild: pin the wheel build environment and upgrade Go to 1.27.1 (#14719)Claude Code
36e47dffchore(web): enforce no-unknown-parameters and no-conditional-empty-object-Claude Code
562a8537feat: streamline GitHub group sync fetching (#14747)Cursor Agent
98c48cd5test: Jira team-managed permission sync (#14730)Cursor Agent
aa089d90fix: show agent-restricted models in agent editor (#14739)Cursor Agent
0758524bfix(voice): ignore Azure EndOfStream cancel on normal close (#14727)Devin

What was excluded

Commits in window	4,093
Merge commits removed	−0
CI / dependency bots removed	−373
Considered	3,720

Bots are excluded from the denominator entirely. Counting dependabot as “AI-written code” is the fastest way to produce a meaningless number.

How this was measured

Measured over February–August 2026, cloned directly. Detection is deterministic string matching against signatures agents write about themselves — no heuristics, no style analysis. Merge commits and CI bots are excluded from the denominator. The figure is a floor: squash merges strip trailers, so real usage is higher. Contributor counts are aggregate — no individual is named.

Run it yourself: npx qmmit-cli onyx-dot-app/onyx

Scan another repository

Try