3.2%

of 3,315 commits were committed by an AI agent — a floor, not an estimate

3.2% agent · top contributor 87.9%11 contributors

individual

One person is driving this. The headline number reflects a single contributor's workflow, not a project-wide shift.

107

agent commits

3,208

human commits

agent contributors

87.9%

largest contributor

Assisted or autonomous

107assisted

0autonomous

Assisted — a developer’s identity authored the commit and the agent added itself as co-author. The agent ran git commit during a working session, with a person there. Autonomous — a bot identity is the author, no human in the loop. Across the whole index, 93.7% of agent commits are assisted.

Agent share by month

Feb26

Mar26

Apr26

May26

Jun26

Jul26

Aug26

Peak month: 8.8%. Bars are scaled to that peak, not to 100%.

Which agents

Claude Code

Anthropic

107

3.2%

Verify it yourself

Sample commits that matched. Every one links to GitHub — check the trailers.

b3591e60fix: apply the selected model's tools and skills when starting a chat fromClaude Code
3749e7dcfix: stop streaming responses breaking on a duplicate output key (#29053)Claude Code
87bed3f0fix: stream post-tool-call thinking into the Thoughts section (#29052)Claude Code

What was excluded

Commits in window	3,362
Merge commits removed	−47
CI / dependency bots removed	−0
Considered	3,315

Bots are excluded from the denominator entirely. Counting dependabot as “AI-written code” is the fastest way to produce a meaningless number.

How this was measured

Measured over February–August 2026, cloned directly. Detection is deterministic string matching against signatures agents write about themselves — no heuristics, no style analysis. Merge commits and CI bots are excluded from the denominator. The figure is a floor: squash merges strip trailers, so real usage is higher. Contributor counts are aggregate — no individual is named.

Run it yourself: npx qmmit-cli open-webui/open-webui

Scan another repository

Try