← the index
osquery/osquery ↗
10.3%
of 97 commits were committed by an AI agent — a floor, not an estimate
Too little recent activity to publish. Only 97 commits landed in this window, so the percentage is noisy. Repositories below 100 are excluded from the index for this reason.
10.3% agent · top contributor 40%5 contributors
team

A small group is using agents. Adoption has spread beyond one person but is not project-wide.

10
agent commits
87
human commits
5
agent contributors
40%
largest contributor

Assisted or autonomous

10assisted
0autonomous

Assisted — a developer’s identity authored the commit and the agent added itself as co-author. The agent ran git commit during a working session, with a person there. Autonomous — a bot identity is the author, no human in the loop. Across the whole index, 93.7% of agent commits are assisted.

Agent share by month

Feb26
Mar26
Apr26
May26
Jun26
Jul26
Aug26
Sep26

Peak month: 28.6%. Bars are scaled to that peak, not to 100%.

Which agents

GitHub CopilotGitHub66.2%
Claude CodeAnthropic44.1%

Verify it yourself

Sample commits that matched. Every one links to GitHub — check the trailers.

  • c80fac53Add negotiated TLS version and cipher suite to curl_certificate (#9071)GitHub Copilot
  • aa9c4fa7Docs: change macOS build steps to recommend Python venv (#9031)GitHub Copilot
  • 7f1b8bb3Set default build options for macOS builds (#8867)GitHub Copilot
  • b8c44932Add a macports_packages table (#9074)Claude Code
  • 5ab48777Fix container bounds checking vulnerabilities (#8825)Claude Code
  • 3e7e1ef4Fix multiple security vulnerabilities in smc_keys.cpp (#8820)Claude Code

What was excluded

Commits in window97
Merge commits removed−0
CI / dependency bots removed−0
Considered97

Bots are excluded from the denominator entirely. Counting dependabot as “AI-written code” is the fastest way to produce a meaningless number.

How this was measured

Measured over February–August 2026, cloned directly. Detection is deterministic string matching against signatures agents write about themselves — no heuristics, no style analysis. Merge commits and CI bots are excluded from the denominator. The figure is a floor: squash merges strip trailers, so real usage is higher. Contributor counts are aggregate — no individual is named.

Run it yourself: npx qmmit-cli osquery/osquery

Scan another repository

Try