Adoption is broad. Many contributors are committing agent-authored work, which is what a real organisational rollout looks like.
Assisted or autonomous
Assisted — a developer’s identity authored the commit and the agent added itself as co-author. The agent ran git commit during a working session, with a person there. Autonomous — a bot identity is the author, no human in the loop. Across the whole index, 93.7% of agent commits are assisted.
Agent share by month
Peak month: 23.1%. Bars are scaled to that peak, not to 100%.
Which agents
| Claude Code | Anthropic | 9 | 5% |
| GitHub Copilot | GitHub | 9 | 5% |
Verify it yourself
Sample commits that matched. Every one links to GitHub — check the trailers.
67762217fix(parser): reject unhashable keys in RESP3 map parsing (#3873)Claude Code5484b0b8feat(tx): skip redundant UNWATCH in Tx.Close when no WATCH is active (#385Claude Code875ce21efix(sentinel): do not close sentinel when replica list is empty (#3795)Claude Code663bfb38fix(maintnotif): tight race condition windown on handoff (#3872)GitHub Copilot15f52601feat(search): add SHARD_K_RATIO to FT.HYBRID KNN clause (Redis 8.8+) (#384GitHub Copilote1a2d68bfix(ft.hybrid): Always generate vector param names if they are not provideGitHub Copilot
What was excluded
| Commits in window | 198 |
| Merge commits removed | −0 |
| CI / dependency bots removed | −17 |
| Considered | 181 |
Bots are excluded from the denominator entirely. Counting dependabot as “AI-written code” is the fastest way to produce a meaningless number.
How this was measured
Measured over February–August 2026, cloned directly. Detection is deterministic string matching against signatures agents write about themselves — no heuristics, no style analysis. Merge commits and CI bots are excluded from the denominator. The figure is a floor: squash merges strip trailers, so real usage is higher. Contributor counts are aggregate — no individual is named.
Run it yourself: npx qmmit-cli redis/go-redis