A small group is using agents. Adoption has spread beyond one person but is not project-wide.
Assisted or autonomous
Assisted — a developer’s identity authored the commit and the agent added itself as co-author. The agent ran git commit during a working session, with a person there. Autonomous — a bot identity is the author, no human in the loop. Across the whole index, 93.7% of agent commits are assisted.
Agent share by month
Peak month: 50%. Bars are scaled to that peak, not to 100%.
Which agents
| Claude Code | Anthropic | 66 | 27.3% |
| OpenAI Codex | OpenAI | 9 | 3.7% |
| Cursor Agent | Anysphere | 1 | 0.4% |
Verify it yourself
Sample commits that matched. Every one links to GitHub — check the trailers.
7dff63f3docs: fix test instructions and refresh CONTRIBUTING.md (#3443)Claude Coded739e58cfeat(search): support WITHSCORES, EXPLAINSCORE, WITHPAYLOADS, WITHSORTKEYSClaude Codead8bc66afix(bloom): handle new cell size field in CMS.INFO reply (#3439)Claude Code56418565docs: fix RESP documentation typo (#3239)OpenAI Codexacf3d33edocs: fix migration guide typo (#3240)OpenAI Codex18c372f4docs: fix "official" spelling in RESP docs (#3242)OpenAI Codexcc446adffix(client): align RedisClientOptions RESP default with RedisClientType (#Cursor Agent
What was excluded
| Commits in window | 251 |
| Merge commits removed | −0 |
| CI / dependency bots removed | −9 |
| Considered | 242 |
Bots are excluded from the denominator entirely. Counting dependabot as “AI-written code” is the fastest way to produce a meaningless number.
How this was measured
Measured over February–August 2026, cloned directly. Detection is deterministic string matching against signatures agents write about themselves — no heuristics, no style analysis. Merge commits and CI bots are excluded from the denominator. The figure is a floor: squash merges strip trailers, so real usage is higher. Contributor counts are aggregate — no individual is named.
Run it yourself: npx qmmit-cli redis/node-redis