Dataset: 2026-10-27-catalog-ai-v2
Ruleset: b2e8889c66f7
Scanned: 2026-10-27
Window: February–September 15, 2026

Catalog tracking observation. This repository is measured with the same fixed window and ruleset, but it is not part of the published benchmark or its aggregate claims.

CommerceAgentBench: Benchmarking Long-Horizon Agents in High-Fidelity, Stateful, and Reproducible Replicas of Real Online Services

01Result

Accio-org/CommerceAgentBench ↗

Accio-org/CommerceAgentBench AI coding statistics: 50%

of 28 commits in February–September 15, 2026 were committed by an AI agent — a floor, not an estimate

Too little recent activity to publish. Only 28 commits landed in this window, so the percentage is noisy. Repositories below 100 are excluded from the index for this reason.

50% agent · top contributor 100%1 contributor

individual

One person is driving this. The headline number reflects a single contributor's workflow, not a project-wide shift.

agent commits

other considered commits

agent contributors

100%

largest contributor

02Drivers

What shapes this result

Mode, timing, and detected signatures show whether the result reflects broad adoption or one concentrated workflow.

Assisted or autonomous

14assisted

0autonomous

Assisted — a developer’s identity authored the commit and the agent added itself as co-author. Autonomous — a bot identity authored the commit without a human identity attached.

Which agents

Agent	Vendor	Commits	Share
Claude Code	Anthropic	14	50%

03Evidence

Inspect the matches

Public commit samples let you inspect the signatures behind the aggregate result.

Matched commit samples

89b2fe23 on GitHubRebrand public name to Commerce Agent Bench and sync leaderboard snapshotClaude Code
5acfa6e9 on GitHubPoint readers at the Business Arena benchmarkClaude Code
88f0f6cc on GitHubRefresh the Qwen reference results and document the thinking requirementClaude Code

04Method

What entered the denominator

The result begins with commit history, removes merges and routine automation, and reports literal agent signatures as a lower bound.

Exclusion ledger

Commits in window	33
Merge commits removed	−5
CI / dependency bots removed	−0
Considered	28

Bots are excluded from the denominator entirely. Agent attribution requires a literal supported signature; no code-style inference is used.

Continue exploring

Claude Code commitsBrowse repositories with detected Claude Code signatures →GitHub AI commit analyzerInspect another repository with the same evidence model →

Reproduce this observation

Run the same detector locally.

Deterministic signature matching; no code-style inference. Squash merges can remove trailers, so this result remains a measured floor.

npx qmmit-cli Accio-org/CommerceAgentBench

Scan another repository

Try