- Dataset
- 2026-10-27-catalog-ai-v2
- Ruleset
- b2e8889c66f7
- Scanned
- 2026-10-27
- Window
- February–September 15, 2026
为纯文本模型"看图“设计更好的视觉工具箱和技能,支持多图理解,图片问答,前端UI还原、GUI 自动化等,并可选无缝接入多个主流agent,直接识别粘贴图片| A vision toolkit and skill designed for text-only llms — image Q&A, long-screenshot OCR, frontend UI restoration, and GUI automation, with optional seamless integration for Codex, Claude Code, Pi, Oh My Pi, and OpenCode
01Result
Anionex/agent-vision-toolkit ↗Anionex/agent-vision-toolkit AI coding statistics: 0%
No signed agent commits found
No agent signatures were found in the last 252 considered commits. That is a real result, not a failure to measure.
It does not mean no AI was used here. A developer can use an agent and commit by hand without leaving a detectable git signature.
02Drivers
What shapes this result
Mode, timing, and detected signatures show whether the result reflects broad adoption or one concentrated workflow.
03Evidence
Inspect the matches
Public commit samples let you inspect the signatures behind the aggregate result.
04Method
What entered the denominator
The result begins with commit history, removes merges and routine automation, and reports literal agent signatures as a lower bound.
Exclusion ledger
| Commits in window | 265 |
| Merge commits removed | −13 |
| CI / dependency bots removed | −0 |
| Considered | 252 |
Bots are excluded from the denominator entirely. Agent attribution requires a literal supported signature; no code-style inference is used.
Continue exploring
Related coding-agent evidence
Run the same detector locally.
Deterministic signature matching; no code-style inference. Squash merges can remove trailers, so this result remains a measured floor.
npx qmmit-cli Anionex/agent-vision-toolkit