Dataset: 2026-10-27-catalog-ai-v2
Ruleset: b2e8889c66f7
Scanned: 2026-10-27
Window: February–September 15, 2026

Catalog tracking observation. This repository is measured with the same fixed window and ruleset, but it is not part of the published benchmark or its aggregate claims.

sp_Blitz, sp_BlitzCache, sp_BlitzFirst, sp_BlitzIndex, and other SQL Server scripts for health checks and performance tuning.

01Result

BrentOzarULTD/SQL-Server-First-Responder-Kit ↗

BrentOzarULTD/SQL-Server-First-Responder-Kit AI coding statistics: 58.5%

of 371 commits in February–September 15, 2026 were committed by an AI agent — a floor, not an estimate

58.5% agent · top contributor 65.9%6 contributors

team

A small group is using agents. Adoption has spread beyond one person but is not project-wide.

217

agent commits

154

other considered commits

agent contributors

65.9%

largest contributor

02Drivers

What shapes this result

Mode, timing, and detected signatures show whether the result reflects broad adoption or one concentrated workflow.

Assisted or autonomous

164assisted

53autonomous

Assisted — a developer’s identity authored the commit and the agent added itself as co-author. Autonomous — a bot identity authored the commit without a human identity attached.

Agent share by month

Peak month: 100%. Bars are scaled to that peak, not to 100%.

Which agents

Agent	Vendor	Commits	Share
Claude Code	Anthropic	148	39.9%
GitHub Copilot	GitHub	68	18.3%
Cursor Agent	Anysphere	1	0.3%

03Evidence

Inspect the matches

Public commit samples let you inspect the signatures behind the aggregate result.

Matched commit samples

a5837d90 on GitHubCI: assert Azure found real checks, not sentinel rowsClaude Code
4bb07c5a on GitHubCI: also run the Azure smoke test on dev after mergeClaude Code
5fad8de8 on GitHubCI: drop the Azure procedures before installing themClaude Code
f96246f3 on GitHubPotential fix for pull request findingGitHub Copilot
568ef0b8 on GitHubFix MSG 8120 error: wrap cpu_count in MAX() for aggregate query in CheckIDGitHub Copilot
99549617 on GitHubInitial planGitHub Copilot
b5830a0e on GitHubfix: emit first markdown detail line when rPrior is nullCursor Agent

04Method

What entered the denominator

The result begins with commit history, removes merges and routine automation, and reports literal agent signatures as a lower bound.

Exclusion ledger

Commits in window	564
Merge commits removed	−193
CI / dependency bots removed	−0
Considered	371

Bots are excluded from the denominator entirely. Agent attribution requires a literal supported signature; no code-style inference is used.

Continue exploring

Claude Code commitsBrowse repositories with detected Claude Code signatures →GitHub Copilot commitsBrowse repositories with detected GitHub Copilot signatures →Cursor Agent commitsBrowse repositories with detected Cursor Agent signatures →GitHub AI commit analyzerInspect another repository with the same evidence model →

Reproduce this observation

Run the same detector locally.

Deterministic signature matching; no code-style inference. Squash merges can remove trailers, so this result remains a measured floor.

npx qmmit-cli BrentOzarULTD/SQL-Server-First-Responder-Kit

Scan another repository

Try

Month	Agent share	Considered commits
2026-02	26.7%	15
2026-03	63.4%	41
2026-04	85.3%	143
2026-05	54.1%	37
2026-06	76.9%	13
2026-07	16.7%	6
2026-08	100%	34
2026-09	0%	82