Dataset: 2026-10-27-catalog-ai-v2
Ruleset: b2e8889c66f7
Scanned: 2026-10-27
Window: February–September 15, 2026

Catalog tracking observation. This repository is measured with the same fixed window and ruleset, but it is not part of the published benchmark or its aggregate claims.

Videodl: A lightweight video downloader written in pure python. (轻量级视频下载器，优先高清无水印，支持抖音，快手，小红书，B站，TikTok，YouTube，FIFA+，优酷，腾讯，爱奇艺，1905电影网，乐视，芒果，咪咕，PPTV，搜狐，Facebook，Twitter，新浪微博，今日头条，网易公开课，全民K歌，CCTV央视频，酷狗音乐MV，新片场，知乎，百度贴吧，TED等海量流媒体平台)

01Result

CharlesPikachu/videodl ↗

CharlesPikachu/videodl AI coding statistics: 0%

of 211 commits in February–September 15, 2026 were committed by an AI agent — a floor, not an estimate

No signed agent commits found

No agent signatures were found in the last 211 considered commits. That is a real result, not a failure to measure.

It does not mean no AI was used here. A developer can use an agent and commit by hand without leaving a detectable git signature.

agent commits

211

other considered commits

—

agent contributors

—

largest contributor

02Drivers

What shapes this result

Mode, timing, and detected signatures show whether the result reflects broad adoption or one concentrated workflow.

No agent signatures were detected, so there are no agent, mode, or timing drivers to break down.

03Evidence

Inspect the matches

Public commit samples let you inspect the signatures behind the aggregate result.

No matched commit samples are available for this observation.

04Method

What entered the denominator

The result begins with commit history, removes merges and routine automation, and reports literal agent signatures as a lower bound.

Exclusion ledger

Commits in window	427
Merge commits removed	−0
CI / dependency bots removed	−216
Considered	211

Bots are excluded from the denominator entirely. Agent attribution requires a literal supported signature; no code-style inference is used.

Continue exploring

Python AI coding statisticsCompare evidence across Python repositories →GitHub AI commit analyzerInspect another repository with the same evidence model →

Reproduce this observation

Run the same detector locally.

Deterministic signature matching; no code-style inference. Squash merges can remove trailers, so this result remains a measured floor.

npx qmmit-cli CharlesPikachu/videodl

Scan another repository

Try