Dataset: 2026-10-27-catalog-ai-v2
Ruleset: b2e8889c66f7
Scanned: 2026-10-27
Window: February–September 15, 2026

Catalog tracking observation. This repository is measured with the same fixed window and ruleset, but it is not part of the published benchmark or its aggregate claims.

Security automation content in SCAP, Bash, Ansible, and other formats

01Result

ComplianceAsCode/content ↗

ComplianceAsCode/content AI coding statistics: 10.1%

of 1,200 commits in February–September 15, 2026 were committed by an AI agent — a floor, not an estimate

10.1% agent · top contributor 35.5%9 contributors

org-wide

Adoption is broad. Many contributors are committing agent-authored work, which is what a real organisational rollout looks like.

121

agent commits

1,079

other considered commits

agent contributors

35.5%

largest contributor

02Drivers

What shapes this result

Mode, timing, and detected signatures show whether the result reflects broad adoption or one concentrated workflow.

Assisted or autonomous

118assisted

3autonomous

Assisted — a developer’s identity authored the commit and the agent added itself as co-author. Autonomous — a bot identity authored the commit without a human identity attached.

Agent share by month

Peak month: 28.7%. Bars are scaled to that peak, not to 100%.

Which agents

Agent	Vendor	Commits	Share
Claude Code	Anthropic	114	9.5%
GitHub Copilot	GitHub	5	0.4%
Cursor Agent	Anysphere	2	0.2%

03Evidence

Inspect the matches

Public commit samples let you inspect the signatures behind the aggregate result.

Matched commit samples

97f262ff on GitHubproduct_properties/10-grub.yml: fix Yaml Lint CI failureClaude Code
ba10fd24 on GitHubfile_ownerships_var_log: add no-syslog test scenarios, fix bash remediatioClaude Code
64a0e259 on GitHubtests: update product-stability reference data for grub2_uefi_boot_pathClaude Code
7231e4ac on GitHubPotential fix for pull request findingGitHub Copilot
b2cc9e34 on GitHubPotential fix for pull request findingGitHub Copilot
f8ce1959 on GitHubAddress code review feedbackGitHub Copilot
083dd253 on GitHubFix offline privileged-command enumeration in remediation.Cursor Agent
cbb36620 on GitHubfix(rule_dir_json): pass rule context into remediation JinjaCursor Agent

04Method

What entered the denominator

The result begins with commit history, removes merges and routine automation, and reports literal agent signatures as a lower bound.

Exclusion ledger

Commits in window	1,754
Merge commits removed	−497
CI / dependency bots removed	−57
Considered	1,200

Bots are excluded from the denominator entirely. Agent attribution requires a literal supported signature; no code-style inference is used.

Continue exploring

Claude Code commitsBrowse repositories with detected Claude Code signatures →GitHub Copilot commitsBrowse repositories with detected GitHub Copilot signatures →Cursor Agent commitsBrowse repositories with detected Cursor Agent signatures →GitHub AI commit analyzerInspect another repository with the same evidence model →

Reproduce this observation

Run the same detector locally.

Deterministic signature matching; no code-style inference. Squash merges can remove trailers, so this result remains a measured floor.

npx qmmit-cli ComplianceAsCode/content

Scan another repository

Try

Month	Agent share	Considered commits
2026-02	0%	248
2026-03	0.8%	120
2026-04	1.6%	127
2026-05	2.8%	108
2026-06	28.7%	143
2026-07	8.2%	171
2026-08	26.4%	197
2026-09	9.3%	86