Pulse
2026-09-18-v3.0
Dataset
2026-10-27-catalog-ai-v2
Ruleset
b2e8889c66f7
Scanned
2026-10-27
Window
February–September 15, 2026
Catalog tracking observation. This repository is measured with the same fixed window and ruleset, but it is not part of the published benchmark or its aggregate claims.

Enhanced LanceDB memory plugin for OpenClaw — Hybrid Retrieval (Vector + BM25), Cross-Encoder Rerank, Multi-Scope Isolation, Management CLI

01Result

CortexReach/memory-lancedb-pro ↗

CortexReach/memory-lancedb-pro AI coding statistics: 14.7%

of 497 commits in February–September 15, 2026 were committed by an AI agent — a floor, not an estimate
14.7% agent · top contributor 37%18 contributors
org-wide

Adoption is broad. Many contributors are committing agent-authored work, which is what a real organisational rollout looks like.

73
agent commits
424
other considered commits
18
agent contributors
37%
largest contributor

02Drivers

What shapes this result

Mode, timing, and detected signatures show whether the result reflects broad adoption or one concentrated workflow.

Assisted or autonomous

73assisted
0autonomous

Assisted — a developer’s identity authored the commit and the agent added itself as co-author. Autonomous — a bot identity authored the commit without a human identity attached.

Agent share by month

Agent-attributed commit share by month
MonthAgent shareConsidered commits
2026-022.2%45
2026-0320.2%243
2026-0416.9%65
2026-052.1%47
2026-066.4%47
2026-0725.8%31
2026-080%17
2026-090%2

Peak month: 25.8%. Bars are scaled to that peak, not to 100%.

Which agents

AgentVendorCommitsShare
Claude CodeAnthropic7314.7%

03Evidence

Inspect the matches

Public commit samples let you inspect the signatures behind the aggregate result.

Matched commit samples

  • 5b4962af on GitHubfix: layer memory_category onto reflection-mapped rows (write-time, read-tClaude Code
  • 147c8fde on GitHubfix: tag extraction candidates with conversational grounding and drop consClaude Code
  • e3b1e0e1 on GitHubfix: harden three scope and ownership leak paths in memory and reflection Claude Code

04Method

What entered the denominator

The result begins with commit history, removes merges and routine automation, and reports literal agent signatures as a lower bound.

Exclusion ledger

Commits in window565
Merge commits removed−68
CI / dependency bots removed−0
Considered497

Bots are excluded from the denominator entirely. Agent attribution requires a literal supported signature; no code-style inference is used.

Continue exploring

Claude Code commitsBrowse repositories with detected Claude Code signatures →JavaScript AI coding statisticsCompare evidence across JavaScript repositories →GitHub AI commit analyzerInspect another repository with the same evidence model →
Reproduce this observation

Run the same detector locally.

Deterministic signature matching; no code-style inference. Squash merges can remove trailers, so this result remains a measured floor.

npx qmmit-cli CortexReach/memory-lancedb-pro

Scan another repository

Try