Pulse
2026-09-18-v3.0
Dataset
2026-09-18-v3.0
Ruleset
b2e8889c66f7
Scanned
2026-09-16
Window
February–September 15, 2026
Local to this browser

01Result

Imbad0202/academic-research-skills ↗

Imbad0202/academic-research-skills AI coding statistics: 74.5%

of 740 commits in February–September 15, 2026 were committed by an AI agent — a floor, not an estimate
74.5% agent · top contributor 51.4%8 contributors
team

A small group is using agents. Adoption has spread beyond one person but is not project-wide.

551
agent commits
189
other considered commits
8
agent contributors
51.4%
largest contributor

02Drivers

What shapes this result

Mode, timing, and detected signatures show whether the result reflects broad adoption or one concentrated workflow.

Assisted or autonomous

551assisted
0autonomous

Assisted — a developer’s identity authored the commit and the agent added itself as co-author. Autonomous — a bot identity authored the commit without a human identity attached. Across the whole index, 96% of agent commits are assisted.

Agent share by month

Agent-attributed commit share by month
MonthAgent shareConsidered commits
2026-02100%6
2026-0391.1%56
2026-0480.6%253
2026-0567.5%117
2026-0674.5%102
2026-0785.1%74
2026-0847.7%107
2026-0984%25

Peak month: 100%. Bars are scaled to that peak, not to 100%.

Which agents

AgentVendorCommitsShare
Claude CodeAnthropic55174.5%

03Evidence

Inspect the matches

Public commit samples let you inspect the signatures behind the aggregate result.

Matched commit samples

  • 7e019f5b on GitHubdocs(readme): Wang, Li et al. 2026 (arXiv:2609.07713) as the fifth human-iClaude Code
  • 110fa6e6 on GitHubdocs(readme): keep the three most recent releases in the six READMEs; histClaude Code
  • b06ceafb on GitHubdocs(changelog): record #867 closing #865; cite #859 on the citation-checkClaude Code

04Method

What entered the denominator

The result begins with commit history, removes merges and routine automation, and reports literal agent signatures as a lower bound.

Exclusion ledger

Commits in window775
Merge commits removed−35
CI / dependency bots removed−0
Considered740

Bots are excluded from the denominator entirely. Agent attribution requires a literal supported signature; no code-style inference is used.

05Provenance

Pinned to a source state

This observation names the repository state, release, and detector that produced it. Use these identifiers when reproducing or citing the result.

Dataset release
2026-09-18-v3.0
Scan date
2026-09-16
Ruleset
sha256:b2e8889c66f72c18a61839f0bf1a9f77b5481ba2def044dba33c797b2f2bdcae
Canonical repository
Imbad0202/academic-research-skills
Default branch
main
Resolved HEAD
3c546bc08c56f79e0068f1ea4f0acedf5bf69b5e ↗
Resolved
2026-09-16
Measurement window
February–September 15, 2026
Download observation JSONDeterministic export · same values as this page

06Peer context

Position among comparable repositories

The cohort uses the same release and measurement window, then narrows to the repository’s ecosystem and removes low-activity observations.

CohortPython · 247 eligible repositories · at least 100 considered commits2026-09-18-v3.0 · February–September 15, 2026 · 145 of 392 ecosystem repositories excluded
Agent-commit share position98th percentile

Midrank percentile; equal shares split the tied positions.

Repository
74.5%
Cohort median
6.3%
Share rank
6 / 247
0th50th100th

Percentile = (repositories below + half of 1 tied repository) ÷ 247.

Continue exploring

Claude Code commitsBrowse repositories with detected Claude Code signatures →GitHub AI commit analyzerInspect another repository with the same evidence model →
Reproduce this observation

Run the same detector locally.

Deterministic signature matching; no code-style inference. Squash merges can remove trailers, so this result remains a measured floor.

npx qmmit-cli Imbad0202/academic-research-skills

Scan another repository

Try