Dataset: 2026-10-27-catalog-ai-v2
Ruleset: b2e8889c66f7
Scanned: 2026-10-27
Window: February–September 15, 2026

Catalog tracking observation. This repository is measured with the same fixed window and ruleset, but it is not part of the published benchmark or its aggregate claims.

LadybugDB a graph database

01Result

LadybugDB/ladybug ↗

LadybugDB/ladybug AI coding statistics: 2%

of 927 commits in February–September 15, 2026 were committed by an AI agent — a floor, not an estimate

2% agent · top contributor 52.6%7 contributors

team

A small group is using agents. Adoption has spread beyond one person but is not project-wide.

agent commits

908

other considered commits

agent contributors

52.6%

largest contributor

02Drivers

What shapes this result

Mode, timing, and detected signatures show whether the result reflects broad adoption or one concentrated workflow.

Assisted or autonomous

17assisted

2autonomous

Assisted — a developer’s identity authored the commit and the agent added itself as co-author. Autonomous — a bot identity authored the commit without a human identity attached.

Agent share by month

Peak month: 5.8%. Bars are scaled to that peak, not to 100%.

Which agents

Agent	Vendor	Commits	Share
Claude Code	Anthropic	15	1.6%
GitHub Copilot	GitHub	4	0.4%

03Evidence

Inspect the matches

Public commit samples let you inspect the signatures behind the aggregate result.

Matched commit samples

22780c91 on GitHubFix use-after-free: reusable ResultSet outlived its DatabaseClaude Code
faa2f0f8 on GitHubstyle: clang-format-18Claude Code
17638af7 on GitHubfeat(parser): allow the graph-projection trio on read-only databasesClaude Code
a3615f7c on GitHubfix typo and default database existence checkGitHub Copilot
9f70b264 on GitHubFix signed/unsigned comparison warning in refreshMultiLineGitHub Copilot
4aa37a9f on GitHubUnsigned difference expression compared to zeroGitHub Copilot

04Method

What entered the denominator

The result begins with commit history, removes merges and routine automation, and reports literal agent signatures as a lower bound.

Exclusion ledger

Commits in window	927
Merge commits removed	−0
CI / dependency bots removed	−0
Considered	927

Bots are excluded from the denominator entirely. Agent attribution requires a literal supported signature; no code-style inference is used.

Continue exploring

Claude Code commitsBrowse repositories with detected Claude Code signatures →GitHub Copilot commitsBrowse repositories with detected GitHub Copilot signatures →C++ AI coding statisticsCompare evidence across C++ repositories →GitHub AI commit analyzerInspect another repository with the same evidence model →

Reproduce this observation

Run the same detector locally.

Deterministic signature matching; no code-style inference. Squash merges can remove trailers, so this result remains a measured floor.

npx qmmit-cli LadybugDB/ladybug

Scan another repository

Try

Month	Agent share	Considered commits
2026-02	0%	131
2026-03	2.9%	104
2026-04	1.1%	91
2026-05	0%	151
2026-06	0.7%	134
2026-07	5.8%	103
2026-08	5.5%	127
2026-09	1.2%	86