Pulse
2026-09-18-v3.0
Dataset
2026-10-27-catalog-ai-v2
Ruleset
b2e8889c66f7
Scanned
2026-10-27
Window
February–September 15, 2026
Catalog tracking observation. This repository is measured with the same fixed window and ruleset, but it is not part of the published benchmark or its aggregate claims.

1 place to call all your agents - OpenCode, Hermes, Claude Managed Agents, Cursor Agents API, DeepAgents.

LiteLLM-Labs/litellm-agent-control-plane ↗

LiteLLM-Labs/litellm-agent-control-plane AI coding statistics: 30.6%

of 1,171 commits in February–September 15, 2026 were committed by an AI agent — a floor, not an estimate
30.6% agent · top contributor 86.3%6 contributors
individual

One person is driving this. The headline number reflects a single contributor's workflow, not a project-wide shift.

358
agent commits
813
other considered commits
6
agent contributors
86.3%
largest contributor

What shapes this result

Mode, timing, and detected signatures show whether the result reflects broad adoption or one concentrated workflow.

Assisted or autonomous

358assisted
0autonomous

Assisted — a developer’s identity authored the commit and the agent added itself as co-author. Autonomous — a bot identity authored the commit without a human identity attached.

Agent share by month

Agent-attributed commit share by month
MonthAgent shareConsidered commits
2026-0531.8%1059
2026-0618.8%112

Peak month: 31.8%. Bars are scaled to that peak, not to 100%.

Which agents

AgentVendorCommitsShare
Claude CodeAnthropic33628.7%
OpenAI CodexOpenAI181.5%
Cursor AgentAnysphere40.3%

Inspect the matches

Public commit samples let you inspect the signatures behind the aggregate result.

Matched commit samples

What entered the denominator

The result begins with commit history, removes merges and routine automation, and reports literal agent signatures as a lower bound.

Exclusion ledger

Commits in window1,359
Merge commits removed−188
CI / dependency bots removed−0
Considered1,171

Bots are excluded from the denominator entirely. Agent attribution requires a literal supported signature; no code-style inference is used.

Reproduce this observation

Run the same detector locally.

Deterministic signature matching; no code-style inference. Squash merges can remove trailers, so this result remains a measured floor.

npx qmmit-cli LiteLLM-Labs/litellm-agent-control-plane

Scan another repository