Dataset: 2026-10-27-catalog-ai-v2
Ruleset: b2e8889c66f7
Scanned: 2026-10-27
Window: February–September 15, 2026

Catalog tracking observation. This repository is measured with the same fixed window and ruleset, but it is not part of the published benchmark or its aggregate claims.

✨ 一款小白也能轻松使用的漫画翻译工具，旨在帮助漫画爱好者轻松跨越语言障碍，畅享原汁原味的日文漫画。利用先进的 AI 技术，智能检测漫画中的对话气泡，精准识别日文文本，并快速翻译成流畅自然的中文。 ✨ 无论是图片还是 PDF 格式的漫画，Saber-Translator 都能轻松应对，让你无压力阅读心爱的漫画作品。在线体验：https://saber.mashirosaber.work/

01Result

MashiroSaber03/Saber-Translator ↗

MashiroSaber03/Saber-Translator AI coding statistics: 0%

of 297 commits in February–September 15, 2026 were committed by an AI agent — a floor, not an estimate

No signed agent commits found

No agent signatures were found in the last 297 considered commits. That is a real result, not a failure to measure.

It does not mean no AI was used here. A developer can use an agent and commit by hand without leaving a detectable git signature.

agent commits

297

other considered commits

—

agent contributors

—

largest contributor

02Drivers

What shapes this result

Mode, timing, and detected signatures show whether the result reflects broad adoption or one concentrated workflow.

No agent signatures were detected, so there are no agent, mode, or timing drivers to break down.

03Evidence

Inspect the matches

Public commit samples let you inspect the signatures behind the aggregate result.

No matched commit samples are available for this observation.

04Method

What entered the denominator

The result begins with commit history, removes merges and routine automation, and reports literal agent signatures as a lower bound.

Exclusion ledger

Commits in window	297
Merge commits removed	−0
CI / dependency bots removed	−0
Considered	297

Bots are excluded from the denominator entirely. Agent attribution requires a literal supported signature; no code-style inference is used.

Continue exploring

Python AI coding statisticsCompare evidence across Python repositories →GitHub AI commit analyzerInspect another repository with the same evidence model →

Reproduce this observation

Run the same detector locally.

Deterministic signature matching; no code-style inference. Squash merges can remove trailers, so this result remains a measured floor.

npx qmmit-cli MashiroSaber03/Saber-Translator

Scan another repository

Try