Dataset: 2026-10-27-catalog-ai-v2
Ruleset: b2e8889c66f7
Scanned: 2026-10-27
Window: February–September 15, 2026

Catalog tracking observation. This repository is measured with the same fixed window and ruleset, but it is not part of the published benchmark or its aggregate claims.

🎨 NeMo Data Designer: Generate high-quality synthetic data from scratch or from seed data.

01Result

NVIDIA-NeMo/DataDesigner ↗

NVIDIA-NeMo/DataDesigner AI coding statistics: 9.2%

of 347 commits in February–September 15, 2026 were committed by an AI agent — a floor, not an estimate

9.2% agent · top contributor 31.3%10 contributors

org-wide

Adoption is broad. Many contributors are committing agent-authored work, which is what a real organisational rollout looks like.

agent commits

315

other considered commits

agent contributors

31.3%

largest contributor

02Drivers

What shapes this result

Mode, timing, and detected signatures show whether the result reflects broad adoption or one concentrated workflow.

Assisted or autonomous

22assisted

10autonomous

Assisted — a developer’s identity authored the commit and the agent added itself as co-author. Autonomous — a bot identity authored the commit without a human identity attached.

Agent share by month

Peak month: 21.1%. Bars are scaled to that peak, not to 100%.

Which agents

Agent	Vendor	Commits	Share
Claude Code	Anthropic	27	7.8%
Cursor Agent	Anysphere	5	1.4%

03Evidence

Inspect the matches

Public commit samples let you inspect the signatures behind the aggregate result.

Matched commit samples

92c818c7 on GitHubdocs(agentic-ci): fix stale exception name in HuggingFaceHubClient docstriClaude Code
6d485a25 on GitHubdocs(agentic-ci): fix stale param name in register_model_configs docstringClaude Code
695e8093 on GitHubdocs(agentic-ci): document client_concurrency_mode in create_resource_provClaude Code
bff09d8f on GitHubfix: coerce judge score drift (#756)Cursor Agent
4c2e026e on GitHubfix: preserve preconfigured logging (#755)Cursor Agent
ec59c529 on GitHubUpdate top models usage chart for 1/24-2/24/2026 (#353)Cursor Agent

04Method

What entered the denominator

The result begins with commit history, removes merges and routine automation, and reports literal agent signatures as a lower bound.

Exclusion ledger

Commits in window	366
Merge commits removed	−0
CI / dependency bots removed	−19
Considered	347

Bots are excluded from the denominator entirely. Agent attribution requires a literal supported signature; no code-style inference is used.

Continue exploring

Claude Code commitsBrowse repositories with detected Claude Code signatures →Cursor Agent commitsBrowse repositories with detected Cursor Agent signatures →Python AI coding statisticsCompare evidence across Python repositories →GitHub AI commit analyzerInspect another repository with the same evidence model →

Reproduce this observation

Run the same detector locally.

Deterministic signature matching; no code-style inference. Squash merges can remove trailers, so this result remains a measured floor.

npx qmmit-cli NVIDIA-NeMo/DataDesigner

Scan another repository

Try

Month	Agent share	Considered commits
2026-02	4.9%	61
2026-03	12.5%	72
2026-04	5.8%	52
2026-05	7.9%	63
2026-06	8.1%	37
2026-07	11.1%	36
2026-08	21.1%	19
2026-09	14.3%	7