Pulse
2026-09-18-v3.0
Dataset
2026-10-27-catalog-ai-v2
Ruleset
b2e8889c66f7
Scanned
2026-10-27
Window
February–September 15, 2026
Catalog tracking observation. This repository is measured with the same fixed window and ruleset, but it is not part of the published benchmark or its aggregate claims.

De-AI writing skill for any Agent Skills-compatible agent (77+ via the Skills CLI), with native plugins for Claude Code, Codex, Grok Build, and Antigravity. Narrative-architecture repair for fiction, venue-matched rules for professional prose. Based on StoryScope (arXiv:2604.03136).

01Result

Nanako0129/sepia ↗

Nanako0129/sepia AI coding statistics: 72.4%

of 116 commits in February–September 15, 2026 were committed by an AI agent — a floor, not an estimate
72.4% agent · top contributor 100%1 contributor
individual

One person is driving this. The headline number reflects a single contributor's workflow, not a project-wide shift.

84
agent commits
32
other considered commits
1
agent contributors
100%
largest contributor

02Drivers

What shapes this result

Mode, timing, and detected signatures show whether the result reflects broad adoption or one concentrated workflow.

Assisted or autonomous

84assisted
0autonomous

Assisted — a developer’s identity authored the commit and the agent added itself as co-author. Autonomous — a bot identity authored the commit without a human identity attached.

Agent share by month

Agent-attributed commit share by month
MonthAgent shareConsidered commits
2026-0859.4%32
2026-0977.4%84

Peak month: 77.4%. Bars are scaled to that peak, not to 100%.

Which agents

AgentVendorCommitsShare
Claude CodeAnthropic8472.4%

03Evidence

Inspect the matches

Public commit samples let you inspect the signatures behind the aggregate result.

Matched commit samples

  • 22303171 on GitHubfix(sepia): keep the Sourati and Saad–Ting sentences at corpus levelClaude Code
  • 70595fba on GitHubdocs(research): ledger Sourati 2026 and Saad & Ting 2026; two evidence senClaude Code
  • ef334233 on GitHubfeat(sepia): call-time inputs for refactor: protected ranges, file scope, Claude Code

04Method

What entered the denominator

The result begins with commit history, removes merges and routine automation, and reports literal agent signatures as a lower bound.

Exclusion ledger

Commits in window163
Merge commits removed−47
CI / dependency bots removed−0
Considered116

Bots are excluded from the denominator entirely. Agent attribution requires a literal supported signature; no code-style inference is used.

Continue exploring

Claude Code commitsBrowse repositories with detected Claude Code signatures →Python AI coding statisticsCompare evidence across Python repositories →GitHub AI commit analyzerInspect another repository with the same evidence model →
Reproduce this observation

Run the same detector locally.

Deterministic signature matching; no code-style inference. Squash merges can remove trailers, so this result remains a measured floor.

npx qmmit-cli Nanako0129/sepia

Scan another repository

Try