Dataset: 2026-10-27-catalog-ai-v2
Ruleset: b2e8889c66f7
Scanned: 2026-10-27
Window: February–September 15, 2026

Catalog tracking observation. This repository is measured with the same fixed window and ruleset, but it is not part of the published benchmark or its aggregate claims.

An open coding agent for your terminal, built by a community collective rather than a company. Bring your own model, keep your code on your machine, and owe nothing to anyone.

01Result

Nano-Collective/nanocoder ↗

Nano-Collective/nanocoder AI coding statistics: 4.8%

of 1,355 commits in February–September 15, 2026 were committed by an AI agent — a floor, not an estimate

4.8% agent · top contributor 27.7%19 contributors

org-wide

Adoption is broad. Many contributors are committing agent-authored work, which is what a real organisational rollout looks like.

agent commits

1,290

other considered commits

agent contributors

27.7%

largest contributor

02Drivers

What shapes this result

Mode, timing, and detected signatures show whether the result reflects broad adoption or one concentrated workflow.

Assisted or autonomous

65assisted

0autonomous

Assisted — a developer’s identity authored the commit and the agent added itself as co-author. Autonomous — a bot identity authored the commit without a human identity attached.

Agent share by month

Peak month: 12.5%. Bars are scaled to that peak, not to 100%.

Which agents

Agent	Vendor	Commits	Share
Claude Code	Anthropic	48	3.5%
Cursor Agent	Anysphere	10	0.7%
GitHub Copilot	GitHub	8	0.6%

03Evidence

Inspect the matches

Public commit samples let you inspect the signatures behind the aggregate result.

Matched commit samples

853e158e on GitHubfix(plain): continue a turn truncated at the output-token limit (#1332)Claude Code
c5933675 on GitHubfix(scripts): the changelog extractor could not survive a metacharacter orClaude Code
45f7ca84 on GitHubci: call the shared update-badges workflow (#1229)Claude Code
c1ed3d92 on GitHubfeat: add session-scoped artifact lifecycle across CLI and VS Code (#826)Cursor Agent
e2770f18 on GitHubfeat(vscode): add agent action timeline undo (#887)Cursor Agent
a0d19a93 on GitHubfeat: auto copy last code block elementCursor Agent
0c8f2ea9 on GitHubFix: session selector only dismisses on Escape key (#984)GitHub Copilot
c1ed3d92 on GitHubfeat: add session-scoped artifact lifecycle across CLI and VS Code (#826)GitHub Copilot
b448f2b6 on GitHubfeat: add .nanocoderignore file support (#881)GitHub Copilot

04Method

What entered the denominator

The result begins with commit history, removes merges and routine automation, and reports literal agent signatures as a lower bound.

Exclusion ledger

Commits in window	1,910
Merge commits removed	−386
CI / dependency bots removed	−169
Considered	1,355

Bots are excluded from the denominator entirely. Agent attribution requires a literal supported signature; no code-style inference is used.

Continue exploring

Claude Code commitsBrowse repositories with detected Claude Code signatures →GitHub Copilot commitsBrowse repositories with detected GitHub Copilot signatures →Cursor Agent commitsBrowse repositories with detected Cursor Agent signatures →TypeScript AI coding statisticsCompare evidence across TypeScript repositories →GitHub AI commit analyzerInspect another repository with the same evidence model →

Reproduce this observation

Run the same detector locally.

Deterministic signature matching; no code-style inference. Squash merges can remove trailers, so this result remains a measured floor.

npx qmmit-cli Nano-Collective/nanocoder

Scan another repository

Try

Month	Agent share	Considered commits
2026-02	5.9%	153
2026-03	4.4%	137
2026-04	0%	144
2026-05	2.7%	112
2026-06	3.6%	195
2026-07	1.4%	143
2026-08	4.8%	271
2026-09	12.5%	200