Pulse
2026-09-18-v3.0
Dataset
2026-10-27-catalog-ai-v2
Ruleset
b2e8889c66f7
Scanned
2026-10-27
Window
February–September 15, 2026
Catalog tracking observation. This repository is measured with the same fixed window and ruleset, but it is not part of the published benchmark or its aggregate claims.

Complete open-source monitoring and observability platform.

01Result

OneUptime/oneuptime ↗

OneUptime/oneuptime AI coding statistics: 6.4%

of 4,652 commits in February–September 15, 2026 were committed by an AI agent — a floor, not an estimate
6.4% agent · top contributor 81.6%12 contributors
individual

One person is driving this. The headline number reflects a single contributor's workflow, not a project-wide shift.

299
agent commits
4,353
other considered commits
12
agent contributors
81.6%
largest contributor

02Drivers

What shapes this result

Mode, timing, and detected signatures show whether the result reflects broad adoption or one concentrated workflow.

Assisted or autonomous

299assisted
0autonomous

Assisted — a developer’s identity authored the commit and the agent added itself as co-author. Autonomous — a bot identity authored the commit without a human identity attached.

Agent share by month

Agent-attributed commit share by month
MonthAgent shareConsidered commits
2026-021%526
2026-030.5%564
2026-040.6%464
2026-050%529
2026-061.7%481
2026-0715.9%693
2026-0810.1%839
2026-0915.3%556

Peak month: 15.9%. Bars are scaled to that peak, not to 100%.

Which agents

AgentVendorCommitsShare
Claude CodeAnthropic2956.3%
GitHub CopilotGitHub20%
OpenAI CodexOpenAI20%

03Evidence

Inspect the matches

Public commit samples let you inspect the signatures behind the aggregate result.

Matched commit samples

  • a9e42491 on GitHubfix(probe): address review findings on the Firefox fixesClaude Code
  • 38b29b24 on GitHubtest(probe): look for the browser launch branch where it now livesClaude Code
  • 1ca29c25 on GitHubfix(probe): make synthetic Firefox (and compose) checks start reliablyClaude Code
  • 9286e457 on GitHubPotential fix for pull request finding 'CodeQL / Workflow does not containGitHub Copilot
  • 99b641e9 on GitHubPotential fix for pull request finding 'CodeQL / Workflow does not containGitHub Copilot
  • bd19f020 on GitHubSeed billing metered price env vars in testsOpenAI Codex
  • 2aced54b on GitHubMove Stripe metered price IDs to env configOpenAI Codex

04Method

What entered the denominator

The result begins with commit history, removes merges and routine automation, and reports literal agent signatures as a lower bound.

Exclusion ledger

Commits in window6,094
Merge commits removed−1,367
CI / dependency bots removed−75
Considered4,652

Bots are excluded from the denominator entirely. Agent attribution requires a literal supported signature; no code-style inference is used.

Continue exploring

Claude Code commitsBrowse repositories with detected Claude Code signatures →GitHub Copilot commitsBrowse repositories with detected GitHub Copilot signatures →OpenAI Codex commitsBrowse repositories with detected OpenAI Codex signatures →TypeScript AI coding statisticsCompare evidence across TypeScript repositories →GitHub AI commit analyzerInspect another repository with the same evidence model →
Reproduce this observation

Run the same detector locally.

Deterministic signature matching; no code-style inference. Squash merges can remove trailers, so this result remains a measured floor.

npx qmmit-cli OneUptime/oneuptime

Scan another repository

Try