Dataset: 2026-10-27-catalog-ai-v2
Ruleset: b2e8889c66f7
Scanned: 2026-10-27
Window: February–September 15, 2026

Catalog tracking observation. This repository is measured with the same fixed window and ruleset, but it is not part of the published benchmark or its aggregate claims.

🌈【C#/.NET/.NET Core学习、工作、面试指南】记录、收集和总结C#/.NET/.NET Core基础知识、学习路线、开发实战、编程技巧练习、学习视频、文章、书籍、项目框架、社区组织、开发必备工具、技术前沿周刊、常见面试题、面试须知、简历模板、人才招聘、以及自己在学习和工作中的一些微薄见解。希望能和大家一起学习，共同进步。如果本知识库能为您提供帮助，别忘了给予支持哦(关注、点赞、分享)💖。

01Result

YSGStudyHards/DotNetGuide ↗

YSGStudyHards/DotNetGuide AI coding statistics: 0%

of 46 commits in February–September 15, 2026 were committed by an AI agent — a floor, not an estimate

Too little recent activity to publish. Only 46 commits landed in this window, so the percentage is noisy. Repositories below 100 are excluded from the index for this reason.

No signed agent commits found

No agent signatures were found in the last 46 considered commits. That is a real result, not a failure to measure.

It does not mean no AI was used here. A developer can use an agent and commit by hand without leaving a detectable git signature.

agent commits

other considered commits

—

agent contributors

—

largest contributor

02Drivers

What shapes this result

Mode, timing, and detected signatures show whether the result reflects broad adoption or one concentrated workflow.

No agent signatures were detected, so there are no agent, mode, or timing drivers to break down.

03Evidence

Inspect the matches

Public commit samples let you inspect the signatures behind the aggregate result.

No matched commit samples are available for this observation.

04Method

What entered the denominator

The result begins with commit history, removes merges and routine automation, and reports literal agent signatures as a lower bound.

Exclusion ledger

Commits in window	49
Merge commits removed	−3
CI / dependency bots removed	−0
Considered	46

Bots are excluded from the denominator entirely. Agent attribution requires a literal supported signature; no code-style inference is used.

Continue exploring

C# AI coding statisticsCompare evidence across C# repositories →GitHub AI commit analyzerInspect another repository with the same evidence model →

Reproduce this observation

Run the same detector locally.

Deterministic signature matching; no code-style inference. Squash merges can remove trailers, so this result remains a measured floor.

npx qmmit-cli YSGStudyHards/DotNetGuide

Scan another repository

Try