Pulse
2026-09-18-v3.0
Dataset
2026-10-27-catalog-ai-v2
Ruleset
b2e8889c66f7
Scanned
2026-10-27
Window
February–September 15, 2026
Catalog tracking observation. This repository is measured with the same fixed window and ruleset, but it is not part of the published benchmark or its aggregate claims.

iOS Logs, Events, And Plist Parser

01Result

abrignoni/iLEAPP ↗

abrignoni/iLEAPP AI coding statistics: 34.1%

of 1,340 commits in February–September 15, 2026 were committed by an AI agent — a floor, not an estimate
34.1% agent · top contributor 95.2%8 contributors
individual

One person is driving this. The headline number reflects a single contributor's workflow, not a project-wide shift.

457
agent commits
883
other considered commits
8
agent contributors
95.2%
largest contributor

02Drivers

What shapes this result

Mode, timing, and detected signatures show whether the result reflects broad adoption or one concentrated workflow.

Assisted or autonomous

457assisted
0autonomous

Assisted — a developer’s identity authored the commit and the agent added itself as co-author. Autonomous — a bot identity authored the commit without a human identity attached.

Agent share by month

Agent-attributed commit share by month
MonthAgent shareConsidered commits
2026-020%8
2026-030%79
2026-040%19
2026-050%51
2026-060.4%276
2026-0733.8%317
2026-0860.7%379
2026-0956.4%211

Peak month: 60.7%. Bars are scaled to that peak, not to 100%.

Which agents

AgentVendorCommitsShare
Claude CodeAnthropic45734.1%

03Evidence

Inspect the matches

Public commit samples let you inspect the signatures behind the aggregate result.

Matched commit samples

04Method

What entered the denominator

The result begins with commit history, removes merges and routine automation, and reports literal agent signatures as a lower bound.

Exclusion ledger

Commits in window2,109
Merge commits removed−769
CI / dependency bots removed−0
Considered1,340

Bots are excluded from the denominator entirely. Agent attribution requires a literal supported signature; no code-style inference is used.

Continue exploring

Claude Code commitsBrowse repositories with detected Claude Code signatures →Python AI coding statisticsCompare evidence across Python repositories →GitHub AI commit analyzerInspect another repository with the same evidence model →
Reproduce this observation

Run the same detector locally.

Deterministic signature matching; no code-style inference. Squash merges can remove trailers, so this result remains a measured floor.

npx qmmit-cli abrignoni/iLEAPP

Scan another repository

Try