Pulse
2026-09-18-v3.0
Dataset
2026-10-27-catalog-ai-v2
Ruleset
b2e8889c66f7
Scanned
2026-10-27
Window
February–September 15, 2026
Catalog tracking observation. This repository is measured with the same fixed window and ruleset, but it is not part of the published benchmark or its aggregate claims.

Solution for long term memory for agent coding CLIs and to facilitate handoff between different agent vendors

01Result

akitaonrails/ai-memory ↗

akitaonrails/ai-memory AI coding statistics: 36.7%

of 1,319 commits in February–September 15, 2026 were committed by an AI agent — a floor, not an estimate
36.7% agent · top contributor 63.6%48 contributors
team

A small group is using agents. Adoption has spread beyond one person but is not project-wide.

484
agent commits
835
other considered commits
48
agent contributors
63.6%
largest contributor

02Drivers

What shapes this result

Mode, timing, and detected signatures show whether the result reflects broad adoption or one concentrated workflow.

Assisted or autonomous

484assisted
0autonomous

Assisted — a developer’s identity authored the commit and the agent added itself as co-author. Autonomous — a bot identity authored the commit without a human identity attached.

Agent share by month

Agent-attributed commit share by month
MonthAgent shareConsidered commits
2026-0550.7%286
2026-067.3%247
2026-0718.5%298
2026-0843.5%237
2026-0964.9%251

Peak month: 64.9%. Bars are scaled to that peak, not to 100%.

Which agents

AgentVendorCommitsShare
Claude CodeAnthropic47235.8%
Cursor AgentAnysphere110.8%
OpenAI CodexOpenAI10.1%
GitHub CopilotGitHub10.1%

03Evidence

Inspect the matches

Public commit samples let you inspect the signatures behind the aggregate result.

Matched commit samples

  • 47593438 on GitHubdocs: add a fair "How ai-memory compares" page for users from other toolsClaude Code
  • 345519a6 on GitHubdocs(research): add OpenViking to the 2026 landscape; surface Hindsight onClaude Code
  • 3ff8b92d on GitHubdocs: add task-oriented cookbook cheat sheet (#726)Claude Code
  • 8d889cc7 on GitHubdocs(changelog): keep reasoning effort under Unreleased after v1.39.0Cursor Agent
  • 569abea1 on GitHubrefactor(llm): drop cognomen and hand-write enum wire labelsCursor Agent
  • 8f664f78 on GitHubfeat(llm): map typed reasoning effort onto native provider fieldsCursor Agent
  • 032d8dfe on GitHubfix(hooks): preserve ingest key across shell retryOpenAI Codex
  • 3ccc0d4e on GitHubFix static MCP project routing guidanceGitHub Copilot

04Method

What entered the denominator

The result begins with commit history, removes merges and routine automation, and reports literal agent signatures as a lower bound.

Exclusion ledger

Commits in window1,835
Merge commits removed−508
CI / dependency bots removed−8
Considered1,319

Bots are excluded from the denominator entirely. Agent attribution requires a literal supported signature; no code-style inference is used.

Continue exploring

Claude Code commitsBrowse repositories with detected Claude Code signatures →GitHub Copilot commitsBrowse repositories with detected GitHub Copilot signatures →Cursor Agent commitsBrowse repositories with detected Cursor Agent signatures →OpenAI Codex commitsBrowse repositories with detected OpenAI Codex signatures →Rust AI coding statisticsCompare evidence across Rust repositories →GitHub AI commit analyzerInspect another repository with the same evidence model →
Reproduce this observation

Run the same detector locally.

Deterministic signature matching; no code-style inference. Squash merges can remove trailers, so this result remains a measured floor.

npx qmmit-cli akitaonrails/ai-memory

Scan another repository

Try