Dataset: 2026-10-27-catalog-ai-v2
Ruleset: b2e8889c66f7
Scanned: 2026-10-27
Window: February–September 15, 2026

Catalog tracking observation. This repository is measured with the same fixed window and ruleset, but it is not part of the published benchmark or its aggregate claims.

Super simple group chat, without a subscription

01Result

basecamp/once-campfire ↗

basecamp/once-campfire AI coding statistics: 25.6%

of 82 commits in February–September 15, 2026 were committed by an AI agent — a floor, not an estimate

Too little recent activity to publish. Only 82 commits landed in this window, so the percentage is noisy. Repositories below 100 are excluded from the index for this reason.

25.6% agent · top contributor 61.9%4 contributors

team

A small group is using agents. Adoption has spread beyond one person but is not project-wide.

agent commits

other considered commits

agent contributors

61.9%

largest contributor

02Drivers

What shapes this result

Mode, timing, and detected signatures show whether the result reflects broad adoption or one concentrated workflow.

Assisted or autonomous

21assisted

0autonomous

Assisted — a developer’s identity authored the commit and the agent added itself as co-author. Autonomous — a bot identity authored the commit without a human identity attached.

Agent share by month

Peak month: 100%. Bars are scaled to that peak, not to 100%.

Which agents

Agent	Vendor	Commits	Share
Claude Code	Anthropic	14	17.1%
Other / generic agent	Various	6	7.3%
GitHub Copilot	GitHub	1	1.2%

03Evidence

Inspect the matches

Public commit samples let you inspect the signatures behind the aggregate result.

Matched commit samples

5742dfaf on GitHubCover markup-only OpenGraph title and description in link previewsClaude Code
87220575 on GitHubKeep one escapeHTML, and make it safe in an attributeClaude Code
e6022a52 on GitHubAssert only that the preview image gained no extra attributesClaude Code
20ab5b1b on GitHubfeat: Add bot API endpoint for adding reactions (boosts) to messagesOther / generic agent
e8c1349a on GitHubstyle: Use bot? predicate instead of role comparisonOther / generic agent
c82a8d38 on GitHubfix: Use correct room messages in pagination testsOther / generic agent
1e9f681b on GitHubScope boosts to the current messageGitHub Copilot

04Method

What entered the denominator

The result begins with commit history, removes merges and routine automation, and reports literal agent signatures as a lower bound.

Exclusion ledger

Commits in window	102
Merge commits removed	−13
CI / dependency bots removed	−7
Considered	82

Bots are excluded from the denominator entirely. Agent attribution requires a literal supported signature; no code-style inference is used.

Continue exploring

Claude Code commitsBrowse repositories with detected Claude Code signatures →GitHub Copilot commitsBrowse repositories with detected GitHub Copilot signatures →GitHub AI commit analyzerInspect another repository with the same evidence model →

Reproduce this observation

Run the same detector locally.

Deterministic signature matching; no code-style inference. Squash merges can remove trailers, so this result remains a measured floor.

npx qmmit-cli basecamp/once-campfire

Scan another repository

Try

Month	Agent share	Considered commits
2026-03	100%	1
2026-04	85.7%	7
2026-06	5.3%	19
2026-07	5.3%	19
2026-08	4.2%	24
2026-09	91.7%	12