Dataset: 2026-10-27-catalog-ai-v2
Ruleset: b2e8889c66f7
Scanned: 2026-10-27
Window: February–September 15, 2026

Catalog tracking observation. This repository is measured with the same fixed window and ruleset, but it is not part of the published benchmark or its aggregate claims.

Write Java. Run on GPUs. Fast.

01Result

beehive-lab/TornadoVM ↗

beehive-lab/TornadoVM AI coding statistics: 11.7%

of 849 commits in February–September 15, 2026 were committed by an AI agent — a floor, not an estimate

11.7% agent · top contributor 41.4%8 contributors

team

A small group is using agents. Adoption has spread beyond one person but is not project-wide.

agent commits

750

other considered commits

agent contributors

41.4%

largest contributor

02Drivers

What shapes this result

Mode, timing, and detected signatures show whether the result reflects broad adoption or one concentrated workflow.

Assisted or autonomous

99assisted

0autonomous

Assisted — a developer’s identity authored the commit and the agent added itself as co-author. Autonomous — a bot identity authored the commit without a human identity attached.

Agent share by month

Peak month: 19%. Bars are scaled to that peak, not to 100%.

Which agents

Agent	Vendor	Commits	Share
Claude Code	Anthropic	88	10.4%
GitHub Copilot	GitHub	11	1.3%

03Evidence

Inspect the matches

Public commit samples let you inspect the signatures behind the aggregate result.

Matched commit samples

75ae0222 on GitHubFix silent zeros when a kernel reads and writes the same half-float arrayClaude Code
0e049694 on GitHubPort the attention and matmul-variant kernels from TileGymClaude Code
f0b8ece7 on GitHubAddress review findings on the cuTile pathClaude Code
ccd3f2e3 on GitHubApply suggestions from code reviewGitHub Copilot
ca50289f on GitHubPotential fix for pull request findingGitHub Copilot
be59b985 on GitHubPotential fix for pull request findingGitHub Copilot

04Method

What entered the denominator

The result begins with commit history, removes merges and routine automation, and reports literal agent signatures as a lower bound.

Exclusion ledger

Commits in window	1,091
Merge commits removed	−222
CI / dependency bots removed	−20
Considered	849

Bots are excluded from the denominator entirely. Agent attribution requires a literal supported signature; no code-style inference is used.

Continue exploring

Claude Code commitsBrowse repositories with detected Claude Code signatures →GitHub Copilot commitsBrowse repositories with detected GitHub Copilot signatures →Java AI coding statisticsCompare evidence across Java repositories →GitHub AI commit analyzerInspect another repository with the same evidence model →

Reproduce this observation

Run the same detector locally.

Deterministic signature matching; no code-style inference. Squash merges can remove trailers, so this result remains a measured floor.

npx qmmit-cli beehive-lab/TornadoVM

Scan another repository

Try

Month	Agent share	Considered commits
2026-02	1.8%	57
2026-03	7.7%	65
2026-04	5%	20
2026-05	0%	11
2026-06	19%	105
2026-07	9.2%	358
2026-08	17.3%	156
2026-09	15.6%	77