Pulse
2026-09-18-v3.0
Dataset
2026-10-27-catalog-ai-v2
Ruleset
b2e8889c66f7
Scanned
2026-10-27
Window
February–September 15, 2026
Catalog tracking observation. This repository is measured with the same fixed window and ruleset, but it is not part of the published benchmark or its aggregate claims.

Generate hands-on, multi-part technical tutorials on demand, with LLM skills tuned to make content approachable. Then you work through them yourself, by hand ✋

devenjarvis/lathe ↗

devenjarvis/lathe AI coding statistics: 74%

of 100 commits in February–September 15, 2026 were committed by an AI agent — a floor, not an estimate
74% agent · top contributor 75.7%4 contributors
team

A small group is using agents. Adoption has spread beyond one person but is not project-wide.

74
agent commits
26
other considered commits
4
agent contributors
75.7%
largest contributor

What shapes this result

Mode, timing, and detected signatures show whether the result reflects broad adoption or one concentrated workflow.

Assisted or autonomous

74assisted
0autonomous

Assisted — a developer’s identity authored the commit and the agent added itself as co-author. Autonomous — a bot identity authored the commit without a human identity attached.

Agent share by month

Agent-attributed commit share by month
MonthAgent shareConsidered commits
2026-0573.2%56
2026-0676.7%43
2026-070%1

Peak month: 76.7%. Bars are scaled to that peak, not to 100%.

Which agents

AgentVendorCommitsShare
Claude CodeAnthropic7474%

Inspect the matches

Public commit samples let you inspect the signatures behind the aggregate result.

Matched commit samples

  • fa580bd0 on GitHubfeat: drive Ask/Verify/Extend in-UI via a local job queue + worker loop (#Claude Code
  • cb661879 on GitHubdocs: add CONTRIBUTING guide, PR and issue templates (#61)Claude Code
  • 2dc77e14 on GitHubBug-fix sweep: reader-progress hardening + endpoint/skills cleanup (#50)Claude Code

What entered the denominator

The result begins with commit history, removes merges and routine automation, and reports literal agent signatures as a lower bound.

Exclusion ledger

Commits in window138
Merge commits removed−38
CI / dependency bots removed−0
Considered100

Bots are excluded from the denominator entirely. Agent attribution requires a literal supported signature; no code-style inference is used.

Reproduce this observation

Run the same detector locally.

Deterministic signature matching; no code-style inference. Squash merges can remove trailers, so this result remains a measured floor.

npx qmmit-cli devenjarvis/lathe

Scan another repository