Dataset: 2026-10-27-catalog-ai-v2
Ruleset: b2e8889c66f7
Scanned: 2026-10-27
Window: February–September 15, 2026

Catalog tracking observation. This repository is measured with the same fixed window and ruleset, but it is not part of the published benchmark or its aggregate claims.

第三方支付对接全能支付Java开发工具包.优雅的轻量级支付模块集成支付对接支付整合（微信,支付宝,银联,友店,富友,跨境支付paypal,payoneer(P卡派安盈)易极付）app,扫码,网页刷脸付刷卡付条码付转账服务商模式,微信分账,微信合单支付、支持多种支付类型多支付账户，支付与业务完全剥离，简单几行代码即可实现支付，简单快速完成支付模块的开发，可轻松嵌入到任何系统里目前仅是一个开发工具包（即SDK），只提供简单Web实现，建议使用maven或gradle引用本项目即可使用本SDK提供的各种支付相关的功能

01Result

egzosn/pay-java-parent ↗

egzosn/pay-java-parent AI coding statistics: 0%

of 4 commits in February–September 15, 2026 were committed by an AI agent — a floor, not an estimate

Too little recent activity to publish. Only 4 commits landed in this window, so the percentage is noisy. Repositories below 100 are excluded from the index for this reason.

No signed agent commits found

No agent signatures were found in the last 4 considered commits. That is a real result, not a failure to measure.

It does not mean no AI was used here. A developer can use an agent and commit by hand without leaving a detectable git signature.

agent commits

other considered commits

—

agent contributors

—

largest contributor

02Drivers

What shapes this result

Mode, timing, and detected signatures show whether the result reflects broad adoption or one concentrated workflow.

No agent signatures were detected, so there are no agent, mode, or timing drivers to break down.

03Evidence

Inspect the matches

Public commit samples let you inspect the signatures behind the aggregate result.

No matched commit samples are available for this observation.

04Method

What entered the denominator

The result begins with commit history, removes merges and routine automation, and reports literal agent signatures as a lower bound.

Exclusion ledger

Commits in window	4
Merge commits removed	−0
CI / dependency bots removed	−0
Considered	4

Bots are excluded from the denominator entirely. Agent attribution requires a literal supported signature; no code-style inference is used.

Continue exploring

Java AI coding statisticsCompare evidence across Java repositories →GitHub AI commit analyzerInspect another repository with the same evidence model →

Reproduce this observation

Run the same detector locally.

Deterministic signature matching; no code-style inference. Squash merges can remove trailers, so this result remains a measured floor.

npx qmmit-cli egzosn/pay-java-parent

Scan another repository

Try