Dataset: 2026-10-27-catalog-ai-v2
Ruleset: b2e8889c66f7
Scanned: 2026-10-27
Window: February–September 15, 2026

Catalog tracking observation. This repository is measured with the same fixed window and ruleset, but it is not part of the published benchmark or its aggregate claims.

ESP-Claw, a "Chat Coding" AI agent framework for IoT devices

01Result

espressif/esp-claw ↗

espressif/esp-claw AI coding statistics: 1.2%

of 574 commits in February–September 15, 2026 were committed by an AI agent — a floor, not an estimate

1.2% agent · top contributor 42.9%4 contributors

team

A small group is using agents. Adoption has spread beyond one person but is not project-wide.

agent commits

567

other considered commits

agent contributors

42.9%

largest contributor

02Drivers

What shapes this result

Mode, timing, and detected signatures show whether the result reflects broad adoption or one concentrated workflow.

Assisted or autonomous

7assisted

0autonomous

Assisted — a developer’s identity authored the commit and the agent added itself as co-author. Autonomous — a bot identity authored the commit without a human identity attached.

Agent share by month

Peak month: 2.4%. Bars are scaled to that peak, not to 100%.

Which agents

Agent	Vendor	Commits	Share
GitHub Copilot	GitHub	5	0.9%
Cursor Agent	Anysphere	1	0.2%
Claude Code	Anthropic	1	0.2%

03Evidence

Inspect the matches

Public commit samples let you inspect the signatures behind the aggregate result.

Matched commit samples

e10438ac on GitHubfeat: add option to preserve settings when web flashingGitHub Copilot
f5c86aa8 on GitHubAdd support for Waveshare ESP32-S3-RLCD-4.2GitHub Copilot
515a93ab on GitHubfeat: add allowlisted http_request capabilityGitHub Copilot
9a1f1099 on GitHubfeat(lua): LVGL method-style API + event loopCursor Agent
b0b27b5f on GitHubfix(anthropic): preserve thinking blocks and merge consecutive tool resultClaude Code

04Method

What entered the denominator

The result begins with commit history, removes merges and routine automation, and reports literal agent signatures as a lower bound.

Exclusion ledger

Commits in window	820
Merge commits removed	−246
CI / dependency bots removed	−0
Considered	574

Bots are excluded from the denominator entirely. Agent attribution requires a literal supported signature; no code-style inference is used.

Continue exploring

Claude Code commitsBrowse repositories with detected Claude Code signatures →GitHub Copilot commitsBrowse repositories with detected GitHub Copilot signatures →Cursor Agent commitsBrowse repositories with detected Cursor Agent signatures →GitHub AI commit analyzerInspect another repository with the same evidence model →

Reproduce this observation

Run the same detector locally.

Deterministic signature matching; no code-style inference. Squash merges can remove trailers, so this result remains a measured floor.

npx qmmit-cli espressif/esp-claw

Scan another repository

Try

Month	Agent share	Considered commits
2026-04	1%	207
2026-05	2.4%	166
2026-06	1%	97
2026-07	0%	51
2026-08	0%	35
2026-09	0%	18