Pulse
2026-09-18-v3.0
Dataset
2026-10-27-catalog-ai-v2
Ruleset
b2e8889c66f7
Scanned
2026-10-27
Window
February–September 15, 2026
Catalog tracking observation. This repository is measured with the same fixed window and ruleset, but it is not part of the published benchmark or its aggregate claims.

Effortlessly request recommended movies, TV shows and anime to Jellyseer/Overseer based on your recently watched content on Jellyfin, Plex or Emby—let SuggestArr handle it all automatically, keeping your library fresh with new and exciting content!

01Result

giuseppe99barchetta/SuggestArr ↗

giuseppe99barchetta/SuggestArr AI coding statistics: 8.5%

of 365 commits in February–September 15, 2026 were committed by an AI agent — a floor, not an estimate
8.5% agent · top contributor 51.6%5 contributors
team

A small group is using agents. Adoption has spread beyond one person but is not project-wide.

31
agent commits
334
other considered commits
5
agent contributors
51.6%
largest contributor

02Drivers

What shapes this result

Mode, timing, and detected signatures show whether the result reflects broad adoption or one concentrated workflow.

Assisted or autonomous

31assisted
0autonomous

Assisted — a developer’s identity authored the commit and the agent added itself as co-author. Autonomous — a bot identity authored the commit without a human identity attached.

Agent share by month

Agent-attributed commit share by month
MonthAgent shareConsidered commits
2026-024.7%127
2026-0312.7%79
2026-050%48
2026-0614.3%21
2026-070%37
2026-084.2%24
2026-0937.9%29

Peak month: 37.9%. Bars are scaled to that peak, not to 100%.

Which agents

AgentVendorCommitsShare
GitHub CopilotGitHub164.4%
Claude CodeAnthropic123.3%
Cursor AgentAnysphere30.8%

03Evidence

Inspect the matches

Public commit samples let you inspect the signatures behind the aggregate result.

Matched commit samples

  • 5a5f2b78 on GitHubPotential fix for pull request finding 'CodeQL / Information exposure throGitHub Copilot
  • 2394bce4 on GitHubPotential fix for pull request finding 'CodeQL / Clear-text logging of senGitHub Copilot
  • 52ba9d69 on GitHubPotential fix for code scanning alert no. 161: Information exposure througGitHub Copilot
  • c64f494b on GitHubfeat(i18n): show titles in each person's languageClaude Code
  • e3e6485f on GitHubfeat(requests): suggestions belong to the person they were made forClaude Code
  • 3ad2bd15 on GitHubfix(jellyfin): request user data with EnableUserData, not FieldsClaude Code
  • f10c7569 on GitHubfeat: add Trakt recommendations automation jobCursor Agent
  • c4c45a59 on GitHubRedact config export secrets by default and document backup behavior.Cursor Agent
  • d36541e6 on GitHubAdd media user and Trakt data to config export/import.Cursor Agent

04Method

What entered the denominator

The result begins with commit history, removes merges and routine automation, and reports literal agent signatures as a lower bound.

Exclusion ledger

Commits in window612
Merge commits removed−159
CI / dependency bots removed−88
Considered365

Bots are excluded from the denominator entirely. Agent attribution requires a literal supported signature; no code-style inference is used.

Continue exploring

Claude Code commitsBrowse repositories with detected Claude Code signatures →GitHub Copilot commitsBrowse repositories with detected GitHub Copilot signatures →Cursor Agent commitsBrowse repositories with detected Cursor Agent signatures →Python AI coding statisticsCompare evidence across Python repositories →GitHub AI commit analyzerInspect another repository with the same evidence model →
Reproduce this observation

Run the same detector locally.

Deterministic signature matching; no code-style inference. Squash merges can remove trailers, so this result remains a measured floor.

npx qmmit-cli giuseppe99barchetta/SuggestArr

Scan another repository

Try