Dataset: 2026-10-27-catalog-ai-v2
Ruleset: b2e8889c66f7
Scanned: 2026-10-27
Window: February–September 15, 2026

Catalog tracking observation. This repository is measured with the same fixed window and ruleset, but it is not part of the published benchmark or its aggregate claims.

React & React Native Components & Patterns (copy-paste components & patterns crafted with Tailwind CSS (NativeWind))

01Result

gluestack/gluestack-ui ↗

gluestack/gluestack-ui AI coding statistics: 1.1%

of 557 commits in February–September 15, 2026 were committed by an AI agent — a floor, not an estimate

1.1% agent · top contributor 66.7%2 contributors

individual

One person is driving this. The headline number reflects a single contributor's workflow, not a project-wide shift.

agent commits

551

other considered commits

agent contributors

66.7%

largest contributor

02Drivers

What shapes this result

Mode, timing, and detected signatures show whether the result reflects broad adoption or one concentrated workflow.

Assisted or autonomous

6assisted

0autonomous

Assisted — a developer’s identity authored the commit and the agent added itself as co-author. Autonomous — a bot identity authored the commit without a human identity attached.

Agent share by month

Peak month: 33.3%. Bars are scaled to that peak, not to 100%.

Which agents

Agent	Vendor	Commits	Share
Claude Code	Anthropic	5	0.9%
GitHub Copilot	GitHub	1	0.2%

03Evidence

Inspect the matches

Public commit samples let you inspect the signatures behind the aggregate result.

Matched commit samples

d758d98a on GitHubfix(modal): enable scroll when content overflows viewportClaude Code
17667754 on GitHubfeat: add Product Hunt banner to website headerClaude Code
917c1b7e on GitHubfix(landing-page): update CLI command to specify v5 skillClaude Code
b70e280b on GitHubdocs(cli): enforce nativewind v4 for monorepo and document behaviorGitHub Copilot

04Method

What entered the denominator

The result begins with commit history, removes merges and routine automation, and reports literal agent signatures as a lower bound.

Exclusion ledger

Commits in window	613
Merge commits removed	−56
CI / dependency bots removed	−0
Considered	557

Bots are excluded from the denominator entirely. Agent attribution requires a literal supported signature; no code-style inference is used.

Continue exploring

Claude Code commitsBrowse repositories with detected Claude Code signatures →GitHub Copilot commitsBrowse repositories with detected GitHub Copilot signatures →TypeScript AI coding statisticsCompare evidence across TypeScript repositories →GitHub AI commit analyzerInspect another repository with the same evidence model →

Reproduce this observation

Run the same detector locally.

Deterministic signature matching; no code-style inference. Squash merges can remove trailers, so this result remains a measured floor.

npx qmmit-cli gluestack/gluestack-ui

Scan another repository

Try

Month	Agent share	Considered commits
2026-02	0%	270
2026-03	0%	175
2026-04	1.7%	59
2026-05	7.1%	14
2026-06	7.4%	27
2026-07	0%	4
2026-08	33.3%	6
2026-09	0%	2