Pulse
2026-09-18-v3.0
Dataset
2026-10-27-catalog-ai-v2
Ruleset
b2e8889c66f7
Scanned
2026-10-27
Window
February–September 15, 2026
Catalog tracking observation. This repository is measured with the same fixed window and ruleset, but it is not part of the published benchmark or its aggregate claims.

eBPF-based autoinstrumentation of web applications and network metrics

01Result

grafana/beyla ↗

grafana/beyla AI coding statistics: 10.9%

of 350 commits in February–September 15, 2026 were committed by an AI agent — a floor, not an estimate
10.9% agent · top contributor 60.5%4 contributors
team

A small group is using agents. Adoption has spread beyond one person but is not project-wide.

38
agent commits
312
other considered commits
4
agent contributors
60.5%
largest contributor

02Drivers

What shapes this result

Mode, timing, and detected signatures show whether the result reflects broad adoption or one concentrated workflow.

Assisted or autonomous

15assisted
23autonomous

Assisted — a developer’s identity authored the commit and the agent added itself as co-author. Autonomous — a bot identity authored the commit without a human identity attached.

Agent share by month

Agent-attributed commit share by month
MonthAgent shareConsidered commits
2026-0222%41
2026-0320.6%34
2026-0410%50
2026-056.2%81
2026-061.7%59
2026-075.4%37
2026-0833.3%24
2026-094.2%24

Peak month: 33.3%. Bars are scaled to that peak, not to 100%.

Which agents

AgentVendorCommitsShare
Claude CodeAnthropic3810.9%

03Evidence

Inspect the matches

Public commit samples let you inspect the signatures behind the aggregate result.

Matched commit samples

04Method

What entered the denominator

The result begins with commit history, removes merges and routine automation, and reports literal agent signatures as a lower bound.

Exclusion ledger

Commits in window612
Merge commits removed−82
CI / dependency bots removed−180
Considered350

Bots are excluded from the denominator entirely. Agent attribution requires a literal supported signature; no code-style inference is used.

Continue exploring

Claude Code commitsBrowse repositories with detected Claude Code signatures →Go AI coding statisticsCompare evidence across Go repositories →GitHub AI commit analyzerInspect another repository with the same evidence model →
Reproduce this observation

Run the same detector locally.

Deterministic signature matching; no code-style inference. Squash merges can remove trailers, so this result remains a measured floor.

npx qmmit-cli grafana/beyla

Scan another repository

Try