Pulse
2026-09-18-v3.0
Dataset
2026-10-27-catalog-ai-v2
Ruleset
b2e8889c66f7
Scanned
2026-10-27
Window
February–September 15, 2026
Catalog tracking observation. This repository is measured with the same fixed window and ruleset, but it is not part of the published benchmark or its aggregate claims.

HACS gives you a powerful UI to handle downloads of all your custom needs.

01Result

hacs/integration ↗

hacs/integration AI coding statistics: 43.8%

of 48 commits in February–September 15, 2026 were committed by an AI agent — a floor, not an estimate
Too little recent activity to publish. Only 48 commits landed in this window, so the percentage is noisy. Repositories below 100 are excluded from the index for this reason.
43.8% agent · top contributor 81%4 contributors
individual

One person is driving this. The headline number reflects a single contributor's workflow, not a project-wide shift.

21
agent commits
27
other considered commits
4
agent contributors
81%
largest contributor

02Drivers

What shapes this result

Mode, timing, and detected signatures show whether the result reflects broad adoption or one concentrated workflow.

Assisted or autonomous

19assisted
2autonomous

Assisted — a developer’s identity authored the commit and the agent added itself as co-author. Autonomous — a bot identity authored the commit without a human identity attached.

Agent share by month

Agent-attributed commit share by month
MonthAgent shareConsidered commits
2026-020%6
2026-030%1
2026-050%1
2026-06100%1
2026-0752.8%36
2026-0833.3%3

Peak month: 100%. Bars are scaled to that peak, not to 100%.

Which agents

AgentVendorCommitsShare
Claude CodeAnthropic1429.2%
GitHub CopilotGitHub918.8%

03Evidence

Inspect the matches

Public commit samples let you inspect the signatures behind the aggregate result.

Matched commit samples

  • b80c0dd7 on GitHubImprove publish job reliability with additional condition checks (#5427)Claude Code
  • 38ebd932 on GitHubFormat code and configure ruff linting for scripts directory (#5428)Claude Code
  • 2a37cc69 on GitHubAdd dry-run option to HACS data generation workflow (#5420)Claude Code
  • 672c846b on GitHubReplace deprecated Codecov bash uploader with pinned codecov-action (#5384GitHub Copilot
  • fdcf17bc on GitHubUpdate dependency ruff to v0.16.0 (#5438)GitHub Copilot
  • 2a37cc69 on GitHubAdd dry-run option to HACS data generation workflow (#5420)GitHub Copilot

04Method

What entered the denominator

The result begins with commit history, removes merges and routine automation, and reports literal agent signatures as a lower bound.

Exclusion ledger

Commits in window156
Merge commits removed−0
CI / dependency bots removed−108
Considered48

Bots are excluded from the denominator entirely. Agent attribution requires a literal supported signature; no code-style inference is used.

Continue exploring

Claude Code commitsBrowse repositories with detected Claude Code signatures →GitHub Copilot commitsBrowse repositories with detected GitHub Copilot signatures →Python AI coding statisticsCompare evidence across Python repositories →GitHub AI commit analyzerInspect another repository with the same evidence model →
Reproduce this observation

Run the same detector locally.

Deterministic signature matching; no code-style inference. Squash merges can remove trailers, so this result remains a measured floor.

npx qmmit-cli hacs/integration

Scan another repository

Try