- Dataset
- 2026-10-27-catalog-ai-v2
- Ruleset
- b2e8889c66f7
- Scanned
- 2026-10-27
- Window
- February–September 15, 2026
🌊深度整合全球顶尖学术、金融与教育资源:学术板块汇聚 JSTOR、Taylor & Francis、剑桥大学出版社等权威平台的论文,并接入 Z-Library 影子图书馆的海量电子书;教育板块收录香港、新加坡从小学到高中以及大学学科教科书;金融板块则聚合香橼、摩根、野村等顶级机构的深度研报,只为打破信息孤岛,构建知识平权普惠知识库。
01Result
hoochanlon/hamuleite ↗hoochanlon/hamuleite AI coding statistics: 0%
No signed agent commits found
No agent signatures were found in the last 175 considered commits. That is a real result, not a failure to measure.
It does not mean no AI was used here. A developer can use an agent and commit by hand without leaving a detectable git signature.
02Drivers
What shapes this result
Mode, timing, and detected signatures show whether the result reflects broad adoption or one concentrated workflow.
03Evidence
Inspect the matches
Public commit samples let you inspect the signatures behind the aggregate result.
04Method
What entered the denominator
The result begins with commit history, removes merges and routine automation, and reports literal agent signatures as a lower bound.
Exclusion ledger
| Commits in window | 175 |
| Merge commits removed | −0 |
| CI / dependency bots removed | −0 |
| Considered | 175 |
Bots are excluded from the denominator entirely. Agent attribution requires a literal supported signature; no code-style inference is used.
Continue exploring
Related coding-agent evidence
Run the same detector locally.
Deterministic signature matching; no code-style inference. Squash merges can remove trailers, so this result remains a measured floor.
npx qmmit-cli hoochanlon/hamuleite