Pulse
2026-09-18-v3.0
Dataset
2026-10-27-catalog-ai-v2
Ruleset
b2e8889c66f7
Scanned
2026-10-27
Window
February–September 15, 2026
Catalog tracking observation. This repository is measured with the same fixed window and ruleset, but it is not part of the published benchmark or its aggregate claims.

👾 Open Computer Use – Open-Source Alternative to Codex Computer Use

01Result

iFurySt/open-computer-use ↗

iFurySt/open-computer-use AI coding statistics: 2.8%

of 214 commits in February–September 15, 2026 were committed by an AI agent — a floor, not an estimate
2.8% agent · top contributor 50%3 contributors
individual

One person is driving this. The headline number reflects a single contributor's workflow, not a project-wide shift.

6
agent commits
208
other considered commits
3
agent contributors
50%
largest contributor

02Drivers

What shapes this result

Mode, timing, and detected signatures show whether the result reflects broad adoption or one concentrated workflow.

Assisted or autonomous

6assisted
0autonomous

Assisted — a developer’s identity authored the commit and the agent added itself as co-author. Autonomous — a bot identity authored the commit without a human identity attached.

Agent share by month

Agent-attributed commit share by month
MonthAgent shareConsidered commits
2026-040%132
2026-050%46
2026-0633.3%9
2026-070%14
2026-080%3
2026-0930%10

Peak month: 33.3%. Bars are scaled to that peak, not to 100%.

Which agents

AgentVendorCommitsShare
Claude CodeAnthropic62.8%

03Evidence

Inspect the matches

Public commit samples let you inspect the signatures behind the aggregate result.

Matched commit samples

  • d9bcc74d on GitHubfix(deps): bump modelcontextprotocol/go-sdk to v1.4.1Claude Code
  • 5c769924 on GitHubfix(drag): drive real window-server drags (deltas, event number, HID postiClaude Code
  • 6489d9d7 on GitHubfix(drag): report delivery path and document the global pointer gateClaude Code

04Method

What entered the denominator

The result begins with commit history, removes merges and routine automation, and reports literal agent signatures as a lower bound.

Exclusion ledger

Commits in window228
Merge commits removed−14
CI / dependency bots removed−0
Considered214

Bots are excluded from the denominator entirely. Agent attribution requires a literal supported signature; no code-style inference is used.

Continue exploring

Claude Code commitsBrowse repositories with detected Claude Code signatures →Swift AI coding statisticsCompare evidence across Swift repositories →GitHub AI commit analyzerInspect another repository with the same evidence model →
Reproduce this observation

Run the same detector locally.

Deterministic signature matching; no code-style inference. Squash merges can remove trailers, so this result remains a measured floor.

npx qmmit-cli iFurySt/open-computer-use

Scan another repository

Try