- Dataset
- 2026-10-27-catalog-ai-v2
- Ruleset
- b2e8889c66f7
- Scanned
- 2026-10-27
- Window
- February–September 15, 2026
中国电信助手,白嫖年入保底256+话费 .每月金豆领取(lv6,1000金豆),每日签到(随机金豆),每日喂食宠物.每日登录奖励领取(5金豆),查看我的云盘(10金豆),翻牌 (10金豆),查看我的订单 (5金豆),打开消息 (100金豆),当日分享 (50金豆),浏览生活频道 (5金豆),查看我的金豆 (5金豆),关注直播 (5金豆),观看直播15s (5金豆),打开消息 (100金豆),答问卷 (100金豆),支付宝小程序
01Result
insoxin/China-Telecom-Helper ↗insoxin/China-Telecom-Helper AI coding statistics: 0%
No signed agent commits found
No agent signatures were found in the last 0 considered commits. That is a real result, not a failure to measure.
It does not mean no AI was used here. A developer can use an agent and commit by hand without leaving a detectable git signature.
02Drivers
What shapes this result
Mode, timing, and detected signatures show whether the result reflects broad adoption or one concentrated workflow.
03Evidence
Inspect the matches
Public commit samples let you inspect the signatures behind the aggregate result.
04Method
What entered the denominator
The result begins with commit history, removes merges and routine automation, and reports literal agent signatures as a lower bound.
Exclusion ledger
| Commits in window | 0 |
| Merge commits removed | −0 |
| CI / dependency bots removed | −0 |
| Considered | 0 |
Bots are excluded from the denominator entirely. Agent attribution requires a literal supported signature; no code-style inference is used.
Continue exploring
Related coding-agent evidence
Run the same detector locally.
Deterministic signature matching; no code-style inference. Squash merges can remove trailers, so this result remains a measured floor.
npx qmmit-cli insoxin/China-Telecom-Helper