- Dataset
- 2026-10-27-catalog-ai-v2
- Ruleset
- b2e8889c66f7
- Scanned
- 2026-10-27
- Window
- February–September 15, 2026
CesiumJS2026年最新Examples,200多个原生示例:自定义纹理、地形开挖、可视域分析、洪水淹没、缓冲分析、日照分析、方量分析、通透分析、剖面、单体化、视频融合、视频投射、雨雪雾、天空盒、场景出图、体积云、闪电、视锥体、雷达扫描、水波纹、动态扩散点、电子围栏、粒子效果、物理引擎、克里金、海流、大数据可视化、坐标转换、相机、飞行漫游、瓦片加载、xyz、tms、wms、wmts、天地图、高德、百度、wkt、shp、geojson、pbf、地形、entity、模型、海量数据、Primitive、gif、聚合、czml、字体图标、运动、3Dtiles、模型偏移、等等。。
01Result
jiawanlong/Cesium-Examples ↗jiawanlong/Cesium-Examples AI coding statistics: 0%
No signed agent commits found
No agent signatures were found in the last 18 considered commits. That is a real result, not a failure to measure.
It does not mean no AI was used here. A developer can use an agent and commit by hand without leaving a detectable git signature.
02Drivers
What shapes this result
Mode, timing, and detected signatures show whether the result reflects broad adoption or one concentrated workflow.
03Evidence
Inspect the matches
Public commit samples let you inspect the signatures behind the aggregate result.
04Method
What entered the denominator
The result begins with commit history, removes merges and routine automation, and reports literal agent signatures as a lower bound.
Exclusion ledger
| Commits in window | 19 |
| Merge commits removed | −1 |
| CI / dependency bots removed | −0 |
| Considered | 18 |
Bots are excluded from the denominator entirely. Agent attribution requires a literal supported signature; no code-style inference is used.
Continue exploring
Related coding-agent evidence
Run the same detector locally.
Deterministic signature matching; no code-style inference. Squash merges can remove trailers, so this result remains a measured floor.
npx qmmit-cli jiawanlong/Cesium-Examples