Dataset: 2026-10-27-catalog-ai-v2
Ruleset: b2e8889c66f7
Scanned: 2026-10-27
Window: February–September 15, 2026

Catalog tracking observation. This repository is measured with the same fixed window and ruleset, but it is not part of the published benchmark or its aggregate claims.

💀 Generate malicious PDF test files for testing phone-home callbacks, SSRF, XSS, NTLM credential theft, and data exfiltration in PDF viewers, converters, and web applications. Can be used with Burp Collaborator or Interact.sh

01Result

jonaslejon/malicious-pdf ↗

jonaslejon/malicious-pdf AI coding statistics: 86.2%

of 29 commits in February–September 15, 2026 were committed by an AI agent — a floor, not an estimate

Too little recent activity to publish. Only 29 commits landed in this window, so the percentage is noisy. Repositories below 100 are excluded from the index for this reason.

86.2% agent · top contributor 92%2 contributors

individual

One person is driving this. The headline number reflects a single contributor's workflow, not a project-wide shift.

agent commits

other considered commits

agent contributors

92%

largest contributor

02Drivers

What shapes this result

Mode, timing, and detected signatures show whether the result reflects broad adoption or one concentrated workflow.

Assisted or autonomous

25assisted

0autonomous

Assisted — a developer’s identity authored the commit and the agent added itself as co-author. Autonomous — a bot identity authored the commit without a human identity attached.

Agent share by month

Peak month: 100%. Bars are scaled to that peak, not to 100%.

Which agents

Agent	Vendor	Commits	Share
Claude Code	Anthropic	24	82.8%
GitHub Copilot	GitHub	1	3.4%

03Evidence

Inspect the matches

Public commit samples let you inspect the signatures behind the aggregate result.

Matched commit samples

79eea630 on GitHubFix Star History chart with sealed-token embedClaude Code
31fa7f60 on GitHubRemove redundant advanced CodeQL workflow (#24)Claude Code
3e787e8f on GitHubRender visible credit footer on each generated PDF pageClaude Code
8b7a0ea8 on GitHubPotential fix for code scanning alert no. 1: Workflow does not contain perGitHub Copilot

04Method

What entered the denominator

The result begins with commit history, removes merges and routine automation, and reports literal agent signatures as a lower bound.

Exclusion ledger

Commits in window	30
Merge commits removed	−1
CI / dependency bots removed	−0
Considered	29

Bots are excluded from the denominator entirely. Agent attribution requires a literal supported signature; no code-style inference is used.

Continue exploring

Claude Code commitsBrowse repositories with detected Claude Code signatures →GitHub Copilot commitsBrowse repositories with detected GitHub Copilot signatures →Python AI coding statisticsCompare evidence across Python repositories →GitHub AI commit analyzerInspect another repository with the same evidence model →

Reproduce this observation

Run the same detector locally.

Deterministic signature matching; no code-style inference. Squash merges can remove trailers, so this result remains a measured floor.

npx qmmit-cli jonaslejon/malicious-pdf

Scan another repository

Try

Month	Agent share	Considered commits
2026-04	85.2%	27
2026-06	100%	1
2026-08	100%	1