Pulse
2026-09-18-v3.0
Dataset
2026-10-27-catalog-ai-v2
Ruleset
b2e8889c66f7
Scanned
2026-10-27
Window
February–September 15, 2026
Catalog tracking observation. This repository is measured with the same fixed window and ruleset, but it is not part of the published benchmark or its aggregate claims.

JupyterLab desktop application, based on Electron.

01Result

jupyterlab/jupyterlab-desktop ↗

jupyterlab/jupyterlab-desktop AI coding statistics: 29.6%

of 54 commits in February–September 15, 2026 were committed by an AI agent — a floor, not an estimate
Too little recent activity to publish. Only 54 commits landed in this window, so the percentage is noisy. Repositories below 100 are excluded from the index for this reason.
29.6% agent · top contributor 100%1 contributor
individual

One person is driving this. The headline number reflects a single contributor's workflow, not a project-wide shift.

16
agent commits
38
other considered commits
1
agent contributors
100%
largest contributor

02Drivers

What shapes this result

Mode, timing, and detected signatures show whether the result reflects broad adoption or one concentrated workflow.

Assisted or autonomous

16assisted
0autonomous

Assisted — a developer’s identity authored the commit and the agent added itself as co-author. Autonomous — a bot identity authored the commit without a human identity attached.

Agent share by month

Agent-attributed commit share by month
MonthAgent shareConsidered commits
2026-0533.3%6
2026-0616.7%6
2026-0720%30
2026-0870%10
2026-090%2

Peak month: 70%. Bars are scaled to that peak, not to 100%.

Which agents

AgentVendorCommitsShare
Claude CodeAnthropic1222.2%
GitHub CopilotGitHub47.4%

03Evidence

Inspect the matches

Public commit samples let you inspect the signatures behind the aggregate result.

Matched commit samples

  • b73261b7 on GitHubRename dev.md to CONTRIBUTING.md and document the test suite (#1121)Claude Code
  • 43f2762d on GitHubRun the unit suite on macOS and Windows too (#1112)Claude Code
  • c7fb3aab on GitHubRefuse browser permissions to content that is not the Jupyter server (#109Claude Code
  • 3e2bb9e9 on GitHubMake env-switch and initial-load failures visible and recoverable (#1036)GitHub Copilot
  • 6c8d2969 on GitHubci: open the release PR with gh instead of peter-evans/create-pull-requestGitHub Copilot
  • 4cb33703 on GitHubtest(e2e): exercise the JupyterLab integration through the labview (cell, GitHub Copilot

04Method

What entered the denominator

The result begins with commit history, removes merges and routine automation, and reports literal agent signatures as a lower bound.

Exclusion ledger

Commits in window62
Merge commits removed−0
CI / dependency bots removed−8
Considered54

Bots are excluded from the denominator entirely. Agent attribution requires a literal supported signature; no code-style inference is used.

Continue exploring

Claude Code commitsBrowse repositories with detected Claude Code signatures →GitHub Copilot commitsBrowse repositories with detected GitHub Copilot signatures →TypeScript AI coding statisticsCompare evidence across TypeScript repositories →GitHub AI commit analyzerInspect another repository with the same evidence model →
Reproduce this observation

Run the same detector locally.

Deterministic signature matching; no code-style inference. Squash merges can remove trailers, so this result remains a measured floor.

npx qmmit-cli jupyterlab/jupyterlab-desktop

Scan another repository

Try